Channel
@k1llerscutie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
279subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002162701639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @k1llerscutie |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/k1llerscutie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 279 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 280 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
749 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5409036320288838064 | 213 | 28.4% | |
| 💘 | 200 | 26.7% | |
| custom 5411201262978894819 | 177 | 23.6% | |
| 🕊 | 159 | 21.2% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @k1llerscutie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
всем привет guyz ЭТО ВИТЁК, пишу через сиви. я вопщем проебал свой осн аккаунт и канал этот(да я ДАЛБОЕБ ЗРЯ УДАЛИЛА СРАЗУ ТГ ИЗ СТАРОГО ТЕЛЕФОНА, НЕ ПОДУМАВ О КОДЕ。 мне очень грустно потерять свой акк там же прем и мои юзы 😥😥😥😥😥) если вы думали шо я слился с вашими деньгами, ТО НЕТ, заказчики и долгишники пишите мнэ на мой нью @bokutosdream и это, нью канал!!!!! @k1llerscutie2
🕊18💘9
вот смотрите. если я предложу вам скора снова нсфв ючи, вы будете их брать? цена от тыщи до тритыщ хз
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💘4
🎀🎀😶кмм для @marshall_tt СПАСИБО ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ МИРИОШИ И ЖЕНА ДАБИ(я не знаю как еще тебя называть 🤔) #commission
custom 541120126297889481933🕊21custom 540903632028883806417💘5
я типо не намекаю
custom 54090363202888380646
До вашего дня рождения осталось 6 дней
💘7
Коммишка для Витька
💘17🕊5custom 54090363202888380644custom 54112012629788948192
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩💕collab with луби !!
💘21🕊8custom 54090363202888380646custom 54112012629788948192
🎀🎀🎀кмм для @ShigarakiWife #commission
custom 540903632028883806421💘13custom 541120126297889481911🕊1
🌸😉😀😃😌🥰 😉😀 😅😌🙂🙂😀😃❗️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 айзава: @SVAGA_CPAKA киришима: @MiiishaUwU хагакуре: я🙋♀️ бакуго: @Blue_Peacock мидория: @gumiside тодороки: @hongaki_mirioshi дд до 25 июля; группа будет; фон буду делать я; скилл средний/выше-среднего(ладно на скиллы не смотрю позуй мне очень гурстно);;
🕊14custom 54112012629788948199custom 54090363202888380648💘3
🎀🎁кмм для моей сладкой мишель кацушель канон привет🎀🎀 🎀 #commission
custom 541120126297889481925custom 540903632028883806416🕊10💘7
нет я не бездельничаю//
custom 540903632028883806421💘18🕊11custom 54112012629788948195
ЗАБЫЛ ПРЕДУПРЕДИТЬ что полноценный нсфв я буду первый раз рисовать, заранее сорян что с анатомией у миня плоха 😖
custom 541120126297889481914💘6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @k1llerscutie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
вот смотрите. если я предложу вам скора снова нсфв ючи, вы будете их брать? цена от тыщи до тритыщ хз
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 344,859 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@k1llerscutie named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“k1llerscutie.” (@k1llerscutie), 279 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k1llerscutie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.