Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 208–225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 22:38
223
+6
9 Sept 2026, 01:17
217
+2
31 Aug 2026, 14:37
215
+5
23 Aug 2026, 21:38
210
-4
8 Aug 2026, 10:49
214
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:14
214
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
235 reactions across 8 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38
16.2%
custom 5395751191873331619
35
14.9%
custom 5386307847279618399
28
11.9%
🍌
24
10.2%
❤
21
8.94%
👨💻
19
8.09%
👍
11
4.68%
💯
10
4.26%
😁
7
2.98%
😍
7
2.98%
🤩
7
2.98%
🤬
7
2.98%
custom 5278554264648562066
6
2.55%
🫡
6
2.55%
💋
4
1.70%
🙉
4
1.70%
❤🔥
1
0.426%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
67
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @k1b35It_business. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
МЕНТОРСТВО ПО ПРОДУКТОВОЙ АНАЛИТИКЕ
Неделю назад я написал, что начал менторить.
За это время уже несколько человек написали в личку и мы с ними начали подготовку к собеседованиям.
Стало понятно: тема реально откликается.
Поэтому коротко и по делу.
Кому это подходит:
• студентам 1–3 курса
• новичкам без опыта в аналитике
• смежным специалистам с IT аналитиками
• тем, кто уже начал учиться и проходил собеседования …
МОИ ОШИБКИ НА СТАРТЕ
Если честно, я благодарен каждому своему решению. Даже тем, которые тогда казались тупиковыми. Потому что именно они привели меня туда, где я есть сейчас.
Но если смотреть трезво, я чётко вижу:
• мог раньше зайти в продуктовую аналитику
• мог сразу выйти на более сильный доход: для студента хорошего вуза старт 100k+ был вполне реален;
• мог намного внимательнее выбирать оффер и карьерный вект…
ПУТЬ АНАЛИТИКА:
Хочу поделиться своим карьерным треком и советами — желательно с 18-летним собой )
• начал свой путь в IT в декабре 2 курса с крохотных 33к руб
стажировался в Т1 (дочка Втб)
бизнес-аналитиком, прошёл менторство по аналитике у Саши в IT Garden, был его 2-м учеником. Пост Саши про меня
Получил первый опыт, но понял что тот продукт компании — не моё. Саму компанию рекомендую + фулл дистант
После ст…
НАВИГАЦИЯ ПО КАНАЛУ:
Костя,
• Продуктовый аналитик
окончил НИУ ВШЭ Спб с 2мя дипломами
(ПМИ и менеджмент)
Карьера:
работал в Т1, Сбербанке и GarageEight (FinTech)
планирую перейти в DS и AI Engineering
Ключевые посты:
• ИСТОРИЯ АНАЛИТИКА (карьера)
• МОИ ОШИБКИ НА СТАРТЕ
• МЕНТОРСТВО ПО АНАЛИТИКЕ
WHO AM I?
• родился в Питере,
• в 18 лет - 1 год прожил в Берлине 🇩🇪 и собирался поступить в Европу
• посетил 15 стра…
Finally HSE graduated 👨🏼🎓
получил сразу 2 диплома:
• тот самый ПМИ
• менеджмент
Сейчас остались только положительные эмоции.
Воспоминания о вышмате, бессонных ночах и экзаменах уже стерлись из памяти.
Оно того стоило!)
Самое крутое что было — наша организация бизнес-клуба ВШЭ и Инвест клуба ВШЭ
Сделали крутые мероприятия и нетворкинг для студентов не только Вышки, но и других топовых вузов.
Помогли нетворкингом на…
🔥21custom 539575119187333161911🍌6🤬2😍2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @k1b35It_business. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Константин Бурмистров {3σ right from avg or ∅}” (@k1b35It_business), 223 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k1b35It_business.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
