秘鲁外卖集团,110万数据!不重复

Channel
橘子🍊的朋友圈
@juzichuhai044
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003877778451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juzichuhai044 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juzichuhai044 |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 153 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 170 | +25 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 145 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 145 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.6%
- avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 27.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (18 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 54 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
有做秘鲁🇵🇪的老板联系! 秘鲁外卖平台渗透数据,姓名,电话,地址!
爬虫渗透料!! 泰国女性化妆品购买记录,姓名,电话,地址!!
爬虫渗透料!!! 泰国农药购买信息。姓名,电话,地址!
爬虫渗透料,泰国减肥人群!
爬虫渗透料!泰国购物信息,女装,香水类!姓名,地址,电话!
Miss Amara 是一家澳大利亚本土家居/地毯电商公司,主要卖地毯、家居用品和室内装饰产品 用户画像: 用户层级 典型情况 Miss Amara匹配度 低收入 对价格高度敏感,优先 Kmart/IKEA/二手 ★★ 普通中产 有稳定收入,愿意改善住房环境 ★★★★★ 中上收入 注重设计、材质、品质 ★★★★★ 高净值 买高端设计师品牌、手工定制 ★★★ 超高净值 顶级设计师/定制/奢侈家居 …
精准爬虫渗透料! HK校服购买记录, 高净值人群 数据 总共46000数据 去重后大概三万多 。这些家长孩子年学费三万刀 数据都是一手且只卖一次
印尼电商物流快递信息 姓名 地址 单号 电话 。精准爬虫数据!
精准渗透料!!!!印尼多家大型企业内部企业用户快递物理数据 涵盖收获详细 收货确认照片
时时爬虫渗透料子。 印尼Roda Kencana Ban连锁汽车轮胎店 49719条用户数据 地址 姓名 电话 消费金额
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @juzichuhai044. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“橘子🍊的朋友圈” (@juzichuhai044), 153 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juzichuhai044.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.