Channel
@justproinvest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
960subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393319167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justproinvest |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justproinvest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 960 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 959 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 956 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 956 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
236 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 169 | 71.6% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 14.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @justproinvest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 October 2025 to 14 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Новое видео на канале. В нём разобрали моменты в портфельной стратегии, которые наиболее актуальны для инвесторов, которые инвестируют от 1 до 3 лет. Даже если вы инвестируете больше или меньше. вам тоже будет полезно. Таблица из видео
❤6👍3
Новое видео на канале. В нём разобрали 10 ключевых концепций инвестирования, некоторые из которых не используют даже опытные инвесторы. Приятного просмотра! Таблица из видео
❤12👍1
По статистике ЦБ у физических лиц в портфелях 38% занимают облигации, а как у вас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7🔥1
Новое видео на канале. В нём разобрали очень частую ошибку инвесторов в облигации. И это не из головы 71%, а реальная статистика ЦБ из отчёта. Также разобрали облигации "с подвохом", которые могут быть у вас в портфеле. Приятного просмотра!
❤8👍1
Ключевой фактор долгосрочной доходности инвестиций На мой взгляд, это способность анализировать результаты инвестиций за прошлые годы и смотреть на все важные аспекты в цифрах. Это позволяет корректировать стратегию и в итоге прийти к финансовой независимости. Когда-то давно я проводил опрос о том, нужен ли вам аналитический сервис для инвестиционного портфеля. И сейчас готов представить вам свой сервис. Что уже …
❤9
Новое видео на канале. Рассказал, сколько денег нужно, чтобы жить на пассивный доход, как вы и просили. Приятного просмотра! Таблица из видео Чтобы редактировать: Файл -> Сохранить копию
❤12👍1🔥1
Какое видео вы хотите следующим?
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4👍4
"Депозиты всегда более прибыльны чем облигации" Моя любимая рубрика - Разборы комментариев Под видео "облигации для начинающих" получил такой: депозиты всегда более прибыльны чем облигации во первых облигации всегда продаются выше номинала иногда на много скажем номинал 1000 рублей продаются по 1500 а купонный доход в 10% считается от номинала то есть 1000 рублей по тому купонный доход реальный не 10% а скажем 7%…
❤10🔥5
Новое видео на канале. В нём рассказал, стоит ли начинать инвестировать в 2026. Приятного просмотра!
❤11🔥3👍1
Лучшие посты и видео за 2025 год Топ составлен в основном по вашим реакциям, лайкам и комментариям. Телеграм 🥇 - "Сударь, вы спекулянт, а не инвестор" 🥈 - Зачем облигации, если вклады дают столько же и даже больше? 🥉 - Серия постов про -1 000 000 000$ Бусти 🥇 - Стратегия на IV квартал 2025 года Уже вышла стратегия на 2026 год в целом и на 1 квартал в частности. Крайне рекомендую посмотреть 🥈 - Работает ли пасс…
❤6🔥1
Как дела с суммарной доходностью по итогам года?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Новое видео на канале. В нём рассказал, как дойти до первого миллиона капитала с помощью инвестиций. Приятного просмотра! Таблица из видео
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @justproinvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По статистике ЦБ у физических лиц в портфелях 38% занимают облигации, а как у вас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое видео вы хотите следующим?
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как дела с суммарной доходностью по итогам года?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каких брокеров для инвестиций на российском фондовом рынке вы используете?
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 14 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто про Инвестиции” (@justproinvest), 960 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justproinvest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.