Channel
@justaddittobacklog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
580subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001936230053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justaddittobacklog |
| Created | 4 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justaddittobacklog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 580 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 582 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 582 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
119 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 21.8% | |
| custom 5289722755871162900 | 17 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5372917041193828849 | 17 | 14.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 10.1% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| 🦄 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 6.72% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.88% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.68% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.84% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, еще не отгремели летние дожди (заиграл Шурá в голове у детей 90-х 😁), а даты следующей конференции TechWriter Days уже известны 🚀 Подача заявок открыта до 10 августа, давайте вместе делать крутые доклады! Даже если вы пока не определились с темой - приходите в личку, подумаем вместе. Как говорится, одна голова - хорошо, а две - еще не Горыныч, но уже лучше одной 😼 Всем теплых майских! 🌸
✍1❤1custom 53729170411938288491
🚀Открыты регистрация и приём докладов на TechWriter Days 4 Конференция пройдет 19-20 марта 2027 года в Москве и в онлайн-форматах ➡️Для подачи заявки на выступление переходите по ссылке ➡️Больше информации для докладчиков вы найдёте здесь Мы ждём ваши доклады!🙏🏼 ⚡️билеты ⚡️афиша ⚡️скидки ⚡️видео
4 мая англоязычные друзья постят шутку про "May the 4th"... 🌚 (это день Звездных войн, а "May the 4th" звучит как "May the force [be with you]") А у нас своя темная сторона 💅😁
custom 53729170411938288493🌚2🦄1
Если у вас страх белого листа, просто включите темную тему
🤣9💯8
Команда! Вчера общалась с инвестором из Европы, к сожалению судя по характеру он совсем не ангел. Почему-то задавал кучу вопросов про бизнес-модель, способы монетизации и продуктовую стратегию. А еще говорил что-то про деньги на семена - «seed money» ведь так переводится? Вобщем будьте осторожнее, вокруг сплошные мошенники
🦄2
В мини-отпуске меня посетило литературное вдохновение, начала экспериментировать в литературно-телеграмном жанре и вести канал от лица эксцентричной основательницы стартапа. Пока сюжет развивается… Самой интересно, куда это всё зайдет 👀 Правда в понедельник уже на работу, эксперименты будут уже ближе к рабочим задачам 🚀
custom 52897227558711629006custom 53729170411938288492🦄1
Читаем с хвостиком книгу Кати Ушаковой 🌝 А как у вас пятница проходит?
❤🔥12❤3🆒2🦄1custom 52897227558711629001custom 53729170411938288491
Уже 15 апреля 🌝 И коллеги подвели результаты розыгрыша ✨ Билет на Аналитический марафон получает: @JasWlf Поздравляю 🥳 С деталями приду в ЛС Если в розыгрыше не повезло, а пойти на Аналитический марафон хочется, организаторы дарят скидку 20% на билет "Полный доступ" по промокоду NB20_AM17 🚀 Всем замечательной среды 🐸
❤2custom 52897227558711629001custom 53729170411938288491
18 апреля, в субботу, пройдёт онлайн-конференции Аналитический марафон 17, тема - "Технологии и коммуникации в работе системного аналитика". Доклады будут полезны техническим писателям, поэтому организаторы приглашают всех на марафон, а еще дали возможность разыграть один билет среди подписчиков 😼 Запланированы доклады (это только часть, в программе их больше): 🚀 "Стандартизация API: от хаоса к измеримому качеств…
custom 53729170411938288494custom 52897227558711629001
Выставка в МАММ - не просто выставка, а целая биеннале с темой "Искусство будущего" 🚀 Все этажи по-разному затрагивают тему технологий (умных и не слишком), как эти технологии влияют на нас, зрителей, и что еще от технологий можно ожидать. Затронута тема памяти и что с ней происходит, когда мы начинаем делегировать функцию запоминания алгоритмам и устройствам: сбежавший из двухмерного мира Марио, цифровые ковры и во…
custom 52897227558711629004custom 53729170411938288493🌚2🦄1
Оставлю на память 🌝
❤6🦄1
🏆Ещё раз поздравляем наших звёзд! Пришло время официально закрепить успех тех, чьи доклады получили самый мощный отклик и наивысшие оценки от участников: 1️⃣ Наталья Борисенко "Документация как продукт: от текстов к стратегии и управлению опытом" 2️⃣ Камила Мазаева "Кому доверить ревью API — техпису или искусственному интеллекту" 3️⃣ Никита Авилов "Сам себе редактор: ИИ для вычитки текста и локализации" ⚡️билеты ⚡️…
🏆6🔥6❤2custom 52897227558711629002🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @justaddittobacklog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,194,439 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто добавь в бэклог” (@justaddittobacklog), 580 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justaddittobacklog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.