Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Just

Channel

Just

@just_tools

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

282subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002422635608
TypeChannel
Username@just_tools
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 12 February 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/just_tools

Growth

2822882858 August 2026 — 288 subscribers9 August 2026 — 287 subscribers16 August 2026 — 283 subscribers24 August 2026 — 282 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 281–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 17:45282-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:04283-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:02287-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:31288first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52603399354114621553736.3%
2827.5%
🔥2827.5%
👍98.82%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 27 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2025, 19:29 UTC800 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Just new product: Flow Flow tracks dips and buybacks across multiple chains — so you don’t have to. All incoming tokens go through several levels of filtering. Price 💳 $160 per month To purchase: @zinc_just | @mikey_just Supported networks 🔵 Solana 🔵 Bsc 🔵 Base 🔵 Ethereum 🔵 HyperEVM ╶╶╶╶╼ Just tools

🔥7👍31

26 Jul 2025, 21:20 UTC640 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Rebranding: FDW → Just Focus on the trade. We’ll handle the noise. What does Just stand for? 🔵 Just focus — your workflow comes first 🔵 Just clear — simple and rich user experince in every detail 🔵 Just functional — pay only for features, not blockchains 🔵 Just what matters — zero visual trash in interfaces Every product we launch will follow this vision. Because in a noisy world, clarity wins. Team b

👍42🔥1

13 May 2025, 20:54 UTC≈1,310 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌐 New token launch alerts for Boop.fun 🪙 All tokens ┖ Channel: @boopfun_new 🪙 With pinned dev twitter account ┖ Channel: @boopfun_twitter 🪙 With custom filtered twitter accounts We've compiled a database of all twitter accounts that have ever launch tokens on boop.fun. This allows us to exclude repetitive rugs from the alerts. ┖ We're currently testing this. An announcement with information will be coming

custom 52603399354114621558🔥54👍1

26 Feb 2025, 19:51 UTC≈2,430 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😭 The market is full of opportunities, even when there is blood everywhere Our Gamble caller @LiSnaSol every day searches on-chain to find some predictable farms, one of them is right on the PnL's. He called $INTLCT on Solana 🪙 at 1:27 (UTC +3) after which it was about a minute to get in and get the simplest X's. 🟣 $INTLCT| 17.5k ➡️ 75.6k | x4 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Get the most out of this bull market. Start your lifechange

custom 526033993541146215564🔥2

20 Feb 2025, 21:34 UTC≈1,940 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 We catch gems every day, even in such a market Our Gamble caller @LiSnaSol called $SOLSAVIOR on Solana 🪙 at 8:46 am (UTC +3) 🟣 $SOLSAVIOR| 11.5k ➡️ 348k | x31 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Get the most out of this bull market. Start your lifechange with us 🐋 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ channel /// public chat

custom 5260339935411462155115🔥4

13 Feb 2025, 21:15 UTCviews —

Just pinned «FDW Update С сегодняшнего дня проект полностью переходит на английский язык. Все стримы продолжатся в приватном чате FDW Community. Канал остается для публикации обновлений нашего софта и закрытого коммьюнити. Вся документация и интерфейсы, сохранят наличие…»

13 Feb 2025, 18:38 UTC≈1,380 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Kitchen" stats just for 5 days 🚬 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Get the most out of this bull market. Start your lifechange with us 🐋 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ channel /// public chat

custom 526033993541146215574🔥4👍1

13 Feb 2025, 17:15 UTC≈1,540 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔔 Stop fading Fuck Da Whales Our Gamble caller @clandike called OG $BROCCOLI on Bsc 🔸 at 7:13 pm (UTC +3) 🟣 $BROCCOLI| 4k ➡️ 42.8m | x10763 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Get the most out of this bull market. Start your lifechange with us 🐋 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ channel /// public chat

8🔥5custom 52603399354114621555

12 Feb 2025, 19:43 UTCviews —

Just pinned «This night's gem $JAILSTOOL 🪙 was caught by our KOL Radar as early as 0:00pm (UTC +3) at $625k mcap, after which it reached ATH $170+ million. Total: 🟣 $JAILSTOOL | $625k ➡️ $170m | x190+ By the way, KOL Radar is completely free and publicly available 👉 @kol_radar…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @just_tools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 621,099 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Just” (@just_tools), 282 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/just_tools.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.