Channel
@junkqunk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001548748798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @junkqunk |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/junkqunk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 140 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 139 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
177 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 86 | 48.6% | |
| 💅 | 15 | 8.47% | |
| custom 5472074079278216214 | 13 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5217466996337165348 | 10 | 5.65% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.65% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.08% | |
| 🙈 | 8 | 4.52% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 4.52% | |
| custom 5386399458932038755 | 7 | 3.95% | |
| custom 5206601132805212480 | 6 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5260547274957672345 | 3 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5418138833457793454 | 1 | 0.565% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.565% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎸Добрый день друзья. Сегодня в гитарной базе мы разберём ОЧЕНЬ важную тему. Настройка мензуры на вашей гитаре. ⚡️Для начала разберёмся, что конкретно мы настраиваем и зачем вообще это делать. Мензура - это длинна струны. Да, её можно уменьшать или увеличивать с помощью микроподстройки на вашем бридже. Для каждой струны длинна настраивается отдельно. Зачем же её менять? Дело в том, что струны - это металл и он имеет …
🔥9🫡2💅1🗿1
Кто может сказать об этом лучше, чем мистер дипсик? Ну поэт.... Рассуждали мы на тему: почему в случае использования лампового усилителя через нагрузку (и последующим подключением в звуковую карту и плагины с эмуляцией гитарного кабинета), сустейн значительно лучше, чем если играть исключительно в плагины.
💅3custom 53863994589320387553
🎸Добрый день, это #гитарнаябаза@junkqunk. Сегодня я рассказываю про косвенные вещи которые влияют на восприятие вашей игры на электрогитаре. У каждого гитариста должны сформироваться полезные привычки, про которые я рассказываю в этом видео.
🔥7👍3💯1
Написал чувакам соло за респект и банку пива (банку пива я выпил в 2016м)
💅3custom 52605472749576723451custom 54181388334577934541custom 54720740792782162141
Снова не успел - Небо в проводах Летний поп-панк от старых друзей. prod, rec, mix: @sdmprod Cover: Лилит Соло в конце: Магнитофон Сергеевич https://band.link/TWanD
custom 54720740792782162144custom 52605472749576723452custom 53863994589320387551
Ситуация серьезная: из трех комплектов струн с озона (ценой в 1500, 1300 и 950 рублей) лишь один попался не палёный. Итого ~ 4 тысячи рублей за струны с которыми я могу выйти на сцену с уверенностью в том что там не случится то, что случилось постом выше. Может прописать гитару в минус и жить спокойно? И богато. На фото новая струна с пачки DR за 1500р
💅1custom 54720740792782162141
Случается…
💅4🙈3custom 53863994589320387553
🎸Добрый день, это #гитарнаябаза@junkqunk. Сегодня раз и навсегда разбираемся с гитарными строями. В комментарии закину схему гитарного грифа на которую я ссылаюсь в ролике.
🔥9👍3🫡3
Добро пожаловать на очередную гитарную базу!🤘 Сегодня добиваем тему про лады. В прошлом посте я рассказал о всех проблемах которые могут быть с ладами. Давайте кратко их повторим. И так, проблемы: 🦈Лады сточились 🦈Лады кривые или посажены не на одном уровне 🦈Лады выпирают за ребро грифа и царапают руки при игре Теперь по порядку их решим: 🎸Если лады сточились в некоторых местах на грифе, то вам поможет услуга «шл…
🔥12💅3🙈3custom 54720740792782162142
Всем ученикам сердечная благодарность за то что продолжаете сидеть в телеграмме ❤️ Авось пронесёт…
🔥14💯3👍1custom 54720740792782162141
Добрый день друзья! Наконец-то я могу выдохнуть, ведь мне отдали мою основную гитару с новыми ладами. Результат выше всех ожиданий, такой ровный гриф я видел только во сне. Сейчас я заново учусь играть бэнды, потому что лады стали острее и струна гораздо жощще трётся об них. Ощущаю себя прямо как мои ученики когда первый раз начинают играть бэнды. В очередной раз убеждаюсь что музыкальный скилл штука далеко не стабил…
🔥11👍3
Сегодня я первый раз везу гитару менять лады. Волнуюсь. Кстати если на вашей гитаре лады выглядят так же как на моей, то это значит что вам их тоже пора менять 😉
🔥13🙈2🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @junkqunk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 463,753 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Магнитофон Сергеевич 🔊” (@junkqunk), 140 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/junkqunk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.