Прочитала 5 глав. Ставлю на то, что Алексис тоже Chthonic (хотя хз, тогда бы, наверное, ментор в ней это смогли бы опознать? пока не понимаю, это у всех внутренняя чуйка на принадлежность или её уникальная способность видеть так других). И ещё на то, что Патро и Ахиллес любовники. Но вообще слишком уж подыгрывает героине этот мув "на тебе самых популярных менторов, по которым течёт весь Олимп и все смертные", хз, к…

Channel
Июльские истории ☀️ Киоко
@july_storyteller
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
701subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001320136838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @july_storyteller |
| Created | 16 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/july_storyteller |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 701 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 704 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 707 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 707 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.3%
- avg views ÷ 701 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 121
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 17.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,937 |
| Reactions total | 333 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
333 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312415623601462834 | 209 | 62.8% | |
| custom 5362039907667686506 | 56 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5462954983240508212 | 26 | 7.81% | |
| custom 5235671468624339774 | 24 | 7.21% | |
| custom 5276292758208782142 | 17 | 5.11% | |
| custom 5323684058713056515 | 1 | 0.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Показываю ближе что забрала вчера с презентации🖤 Книжечки: запрещёночку урвала с рук, а вампиров мне Даша просто отдала. Я давно охотились за ней на английском, но озон не на моей стороне, так что спасибо за подгон, буду читать на русском🥹 Подарочки от Маши: оказывается, когда я вчера впопыхах пыталась посмотреть чего там классного, не всё заметила! Много радуюсь, а Манго уже унюхала мыш🌚 Ну и мерч с девочек насоб…
custom 536203990766768650610custom 53124156236014628343
вчера, когда читала "Пасху мертвых", в голове почему-то был этот мем спойлерный по факту, поэтому я покрыла пчелами
custom 531241562360146283414custom 53236840587130565151
С этого очень смеюсь😅
custom 531241562360146283429
Я на встречах напрочь забываю о контенте, но Маша о вас заботится лучше, поэтому дружно скажем ей спасибо 🛐
custom 531241562360146283419
Поэтому видео, если кому-нибудь нужно или интересно
custom 531241562360146283418
Всем спасибо, было очень классно! Увожу с собой домой вашу любовь🖤
custom 531241562360146283430
Подарок уже тоже подарили🥹💖
custom 531241562360146283429
Не успела порог переступить, уже припахали, девочки 💅
custom 527629275820878214217custom 531241562360146283410
Video, posted without a caption
custom 546295498324050821226
Если вам нравятся отношения Киоко и Норико, вам понравятся отношения Алексис и Никс🖤
custom 531241562360146283420
Взяла с собой Алексис, чтобы развлекала меня в дороге. Посмотрим, насколько у неё это получится✨
custom 531241562360146283417
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @july_storyteller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 137,212 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kainisgottasadae · 3,8112 postsШуфлядка Писателя
@shuflyadkapisatelya · 2,2452 postsток и букток 📚
@andbook_tok · 9,0041 postЧерткова || Про книги
@chertkova_books · 1,5691 postДария Каравацкая || Приют воображаемых людей
@dariia_iznutri · 1681 postВлад | Душевный Душнила 🤓
@heartful_nerd · 621 postИди дворами | Ия Поликарпова-Гилевич
@idi_dvorami · 951 postЗапределье коробки Эл Моргот
@mrgtghost · 10,4181 postКниги Анны Осокиной
@osoka_books · 3081 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Июльские истории ☀️ Киоко” (@july_storyteller), 701 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/july_storyteller.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.