Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юля, вы не поверите!

Channel

Юля, вы не поверите!

@julia_skornyakova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

220subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524632655
TypeChannel
Username@julia_skornyakova
Created24 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/julia_skornyakova

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

220221220.57 August 2026 — 221 subscribers8 August 2026 — 221 subscribers22 August 2026 — 220 subscribers29 August 2026 — 221 subscribers14 September 2026 — 220 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 38 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220–221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 05:21220-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:39221+1
22 Aug 2026, 19:03220-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:33221no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:30221first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤555.6%
👍333.3%
🔥111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC46 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С Вадькиным не видеться несколько лет, прийти погулять замученной после работы, а потом хохотать, не переставая, говорить без всяких остановок, фильтров и со счастливым ощущением, что такой друг есть. Люблю! (История про музыкальный магазин и мороз теперь навечно со мной😄)

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Август... Туман, пузом касающийся изгиба реки и домиков около берега. Роса на траве - стоит только тронуть, стоит только шагнуть в эту зелёную сверкающую подушку, и можно взвизшиыаиь: и холодно, и восторг. Бабушка, продающая морковку с грядки за 150 рублей кулёк, по дороге домой можно купить. "У вас же пиджак в руках и пакета нет, как повезёте, неудобно же", - так она пакет-маечку новую живо вручает, которую в мага…

❤5

29 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

День сегодня начался с целого бокса малины из Балея, и это было счастье. Закончился он поглядыванием на градусник в аптечке (кто бы запретил холодный квас и арбуз из холодильника летом😄 - нереально же), но это мелочи. Сегодня пришли вдвоём с Сашей Аксёновой на пресс-подход организаторов конкурса "Родники", поговорили с Родионом Газмановым и Еленой Ульяновой про то, как вся эта махина работает, а Олеся Петунина расск…

👍1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, мои любимые романтики из округов, которые снимают потрясающие фото речек и гор Забайкалья, просили ссылки для прямой загрузки этих фото, чтобы мы в пресс-службе сразу их ловили. Вышла из отпуска, придумала публичные группы про красоту нашего края в ОК, ВК и Мах. Грузить можно за секунды, а можно просто заходить любоваться. Надеюсь, будут присылать снимки из всех районов. Ну и мы сразу утянули несколько фот…

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @julia_skornyakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МИРХАЙДАРОВ
@mirhaidarov_marat · 22,636
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
Chita.Ru | Новости Читы
@chitaru75 · 104,732
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
ZAB.RU
@zabru_chita · 22,997
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юля, вы не поверите!” (@julia_skornyakova), 220 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julia_skornyakova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.