Channel

Ипотека/недвижимость с Юлией Максимович

@julia_maksimovich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

440subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001615801255
Type	Channel
Username	@julia_maksimovich
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	8 September 2026
Measurements held	6
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/julia_maksimovich

Growth

6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–470 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Sept 2026, 10:35	440	-15
30 Aug 2026, 01:48	455	-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:43	456	-3
15 Aug 2026, 12:38	459	-7
8 Aug 2026, 04:47	466	no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:44	466	first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 34s
Average length: 34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	8	53.3%
🔥	3	20.0%
👍	2	13.3%
👏	1	6.67%
💯	1	6.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очередная история вывода созаемщика из кредитного договора, причём, не путем рефинансирования, а чистого вывода. Процедура длилась почти 3 месяца. Мы помимо анализа ситуации, проанализировали состояние кредитной истории на предмет того, сможет ли банк принять основание того, что заемщик сможет быть надёжным с точки зрения именно его андеррайтинга Был нотариус Были препятствия, трудности. Но мы все вместе справи…

👍1