Channel
@jul_lazzz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
166subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002691080876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jul_lazzz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jul_lazzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 166 | +15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 151 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:04 | 148 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 147 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 148 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 146 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 146 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
87 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5425060482492938850 | 23 | 26.4% | |
| custom 6210511362712406643 | 14 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5355138230230484862 | 12 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5357428667569948200 | 12 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5280511580029608639 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5280473762842569125 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| custom 5298827296264698844 | 6 | 6.90% | |
| custom 5386587088873331829 | 3 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Получается рабоче-музыкально-ленивое лето. Учу петь, пишу песни, снимаю контент и смотрю фильмы. Много фильмов. А фото последнее - это я на фоне дедлайнов. Ну ничего, все вывезем🤝 А вы там как, как лето? Песню ждете? ;)
custom 52804737628425691258custom 52988272962646988444custom 53574286675699482001
На дне рождении у Киры🩷🎥✨
custom 621051136271240664310custom 52805115800296086394
Возвращаться всегда тяжело, поэтому мне понадобится ваша поддержка! После выхода черного коня я написала десятки песен, некоторыми делилась с вами) Они все получались такими разными: одна песня - хоррор колыбельная с уходом в речитатив, другая - нежная песня про любовь, еще одна - саундтрек к утреннему мегаполису. Я не знала как подступиться к новому релизу, какую песню выбрать. Недавно ночью за 3 часа написала песн…
custom 542506048249293885010custom 52988272962646988442custom 53551382302304848622custom 53574286675699482001
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 62105113627124066434custom 53551382302304848623
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53551382302304848625custom 53865870888733318293
контрасты
custom 53574286675699482008
🕶️
custom 542506048249293885011custom 53574286675699482002
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52805115800296086395custom 53551382302304848622custom 54250604824929388502
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @jul_lazzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAZAREZA” (@jul_lazzz), 166 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jul_lazzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.