Не знаю що за гра але

Channel
JuicyJuice’s Biorb Gang
@juicyjuice_BG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001351849493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juicyjuice_BG |
| Created | 14 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juicyjuice_BG |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 187 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 186 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 187 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 190 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 190 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 44.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://store.steampowered.com/app/3812600/ReStory_Chill_Electronics_Repairs/ Нагадую що ця гра це російське лайно ) а то побачив у пари людей в бажаному )
💯2
Проходимо сюжетики в Токоні і в Аватарі! https://www.twitch.tv/juicyjuice_cg
Трішечки про мертвонароджені файтинги) Поки піковий онлайн Токона в стімі 24к. Я думаю що розгонеться ще до 40к максимум (Азія ще спить, Амурика тільки прокинулась) У Аватара пік 12к, що здавалось би мало, але 1) Аватар не така популярна франшиза як Марвел 2) В Аватар стільки бабла як в Токон не вбахали 3) Азіатам (мені здається) не так цікавий Аватар як Марвел У Токона гарний старт, але все ще ставлю, що через пі…
❤2
Я стрімер цих ваших файтингів - я мушу!
😁5
Взагалі знаєте що мене дивує останні мої стріми? Я запускаю стріми по файтингам, в яких показую такий собі перформенс або абсолютно не професійно коментую турніри, АЛЕ онліне тримається в районі 10-15 людей. Для мене це загадка. Ще трішки і я подумаю що я цікавий і ви приходите подивитись шо я там роблю 😯
❤5🤔1
Купляти Марвел Токон за 2000 гримнів?
- Так27%
- Ні45%
- Купляй Токон за 2500, пуська! 😈😈😈45%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Підтримав збір, підтримав Грушку, отримав два пазла і купу ніштяків! Один пазл зберу на стрімі Інший пазл і ніштяки за щось розіграю! Третій пазл - не замовив, йдіть до грушки і замовьте його самостійно!
❤4
Дурка стрим
Київ, тримайтесь 🫂 Збір тут https://send.monobank.ua/jar/2Ug53yMm75
А хоча знаєте що? Не сьогодні, але 100500%т завтра! Сьогодні я трішки полаблю Аватара, а завтра роздам гівна 🦜 Сьогодні йдіть подивіться на Кіру з Рітою та Моримуха, а завтра вже до мене
❤🔥3
Що пострімити?
- Прагмата + Онлайн Аватара44%
- Сюжетка Аватара + Онлайн Аватар33%
- Онлайн Аватара, а далі поодливмось22%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @juicyjuice_BG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Купляти Марвел Токон за 2000 гримнів?
- Так27%
- Ні45%
- Купляй Токон за 2500, пуська! 😈😈😈45%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Що пострімити?
- Прагмата + Онлайн Аватара44%
- Сюжетка Аватара + Онлайн Аватар33%
- Онлайн Аватара, а далі поодливмось22%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JuicyJuice’s Biorb Gang” (@juicyjuice_BG), 187 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juicyjuice_BG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.