Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Judge Jeanine • Jeanine Pirro

Channel

Judge Jeanine • Jeanine Pirro

@judgejeanine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001940272837
TypeChannel
Username@judgejeanine
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/judgejeanine

Growth

1311371348 August 2026 — 136 subscribers8 August 2026 — 136 subscribers9 August 2026 — 137 subscribers16 August 2026 — 133 subscribers1 September 2026 — 131 subscribers10 September 2026 — 132 subscribers18 September 2026 — 133 subscribers1338 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:15133+1
10 Sept 2026, 16:40132+1
1 Sept 2026, 01:49131-2
16 Aug 2026, 19:55133-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:53137+1
8 Aug 2026, 23:45136no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:31136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 48s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6939.9%
6839.3%
🔥1911.0%
👏95.20%
🤬84.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC339 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Anthony Fauci: No bark, no bite. @JudgeJeanine

👍32

26 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In the Philippines with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor, discussing ways to protect Americans from international scam centers. @JudgeJeanine

👍6

11 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC221 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

When law and order is restored, crime is repressed. 🏛️ ⚖️Nowhere is that clearer than right here in our nation’s capital! Thank you, President Trump! 🇺🇸 https://thefederalist.com/2026/07/09/trumps-immigration-enforcement-really-is-slashing-violent-crime/ @JudgeJeanine

👍16

4 May 2026, 03:01 UTC267 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

@JudgeJeanine on Cole Allen: "It is definitively his bullet he hit at that Secret Service agent. He had every intention to kill him, and anyone who got in his way, on his way to killing the President of the United States. This was a premeditated, violent act, calculated to take down the president, and anyone who was in the line of fire." @RapidResponse

6👍5

3 May 2026, 19:58 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

We will continue to be transparent with the evidence against Cole Allen. @JudgeJeanine

👍7

3 May 2026, 19:17 UTC158 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

What we have learned from the investigation: Cole Allen did everything necessary, in his mind, to kill the President. He faces life in prison for that intent and we are extremely confident about the case my office is bringing against him. @JudgeJeanine

👍5

16 Apr 2026, 04:37 UTC155 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Pierre Black operated a street-level fentanyl distribution scheme out of a storefront in the District. He sold the drug to an undercover officer on six occasions—an amount large enough to equal roughly 80,000 potentially lethal doses. He also kept a loaded firearm alongside his supply and conducted these activities in a neighborhood already reeling from a fatal overdose. @JudgeJeanine

🤬81

15 Apr 2026, 04:56 UTC114 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Five women have made serious allegations against Congressman Eric Swalwell. I encourage anyone with credible information or complaints involving similar conduct in the District of Columbia to contact my office’s hotline 202-252-0809 @JudgeJeanine

7

15 Apr 2026, 04:36 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Any construction project that has cost overruns of almost 80% over the original construction budget deserves some serious review. And these people are in charge of monetary policy in the United States? https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/jeanine-pirros-prosecutors-make-surprise-visit-to-fed-headquarters-86d9d4bd @JudgeJeanine

👍72

14 Apr 2026, 04:31 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Enough is enough. Everyone in Washington D.C. is entitled to a safe city and the right to live in quiet enjoyment without the fear of teen takeovers and lawlessness. It’s time to lower the age of accountability and take our streets back! @JudgeJeanine

🔥8

9 Apr 2026, 22:08 UTC86 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Last night at the reception in honor of 250 Years of Freedom at the White House with Gady Serralta, Director of U.S. Marshals Service, and Monica Crowley, Ambassador of Protocol @JudgeJeanine

👍8

9 Apr 2026, 21:54 UTC74 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Talk is cheap. The D.C. Council’s decision to delay a vote guarantees the juvenile curfew expires April 15—creating at least a weeklong gap, including spring break, where this proven deterrent disappears. That lapse doesn’t protect the public—it emboldens repeat offenders. @JudgeJeanine

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @judgejeanine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Judge Jeanine • Jeanine Pirro” (@judgejeanine), 133 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/judgejeanine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.