Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

JUBRIQUE, JARDÍN DE CHARAXES

@jubrique

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

128subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001137836334
TypeChannel
Username@jubrique
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jubrique

Growth

128129128.56 August 2026 — 129 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 128 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:03128-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:16129no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:36129first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 10 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
646.2%
👍538.5%
🥰215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2023 to 17 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2024, 17:55 UTC165 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pulipastorPhoto

ALGARROBOS ESPONTÁNEOS EN PERIDOTITAS Hace mucho que el algarrobo (Ceratonia siliqua L.) ganó el relato al fanatismo botánico y ecologismo radical. Descubierto oink un rodal desconocido donde prospera de forma espontánea y no asistida tras haber sufrido los percances del incendio. La recuperación de los ejemplares post-fuego frente al pinar no resulta asombrosa, sino dentro de su marco habitual. ¡¡¡¡ Pa darles un ósc

👍1

17 Sept 2024, 17:55 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pulipastorPhoto

ALGARROBOS ESPONTÁNEOS SOBRE PERIDOTITA Sierra Bermeja, Benahavís Seguimos encontrando pies espontáneos y dispersos de algarrobo (Ceratonia siliqua L.), a medida que indagamos y nos adentramos en laderas y barrancos de Sierra Bermeja. La producción de algarrobas vale para alimento de fauna silvestre y resulta muy gratificante para los responsables de la gestión.

2👍1

7 Jul 2024, 14:42 UTC240 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DiarioSUR

🔶 SUR+ 📰 La temporada de baño ya está abierta en el río Genal, un poco más tarde de lo habitual, puesto que el verano, con mayúsculas, se ha hecho de rogar. A lo largo de este cauce, que da nombre a esta parte de la Serranía de Ronda, en la que se asientan una quincena de pequeños pueblos; es posible encontrar pozas en las que sumergirse, con gran profundidad, en algunos casos, y mitigar el calor. Uno de los puntos m

10 May 2024, 08:55 UTC254 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DiarioSUR

🔶 SUR+ 📰 El disfraz no es un elemento exclusivo de las fiestas del Carnaval en la provincia de Málaga. No en vano, hay otras citas del calendario en la que el público se pone una indumentaria para parecer lo que no es. Basta acordarse de la multitudinaria cita que cada Nochevieja ofrece Coín en sus calles o la que organizan en Villanueva del Trabuco en torno a la fiesta patronal que celebran en septiembre, que apenas

29 Apr 2024, 09:52 UTC206 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @todomonteVideo

Video, posted without a caption

1

29 Apr 2024, 09:52 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @todomonteVideo

FUENTE DEL BARRANCO DE LAS LAGUNETAS. Jubrique, Málaga

2

10 Dec 2023, 12:00 UTC279 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pulipastorPhoto

PLANTA DE ALGARROBO SOBRE PERIDOTITA Procedente de plantación con voluntariado ha conseguido sobrevivir al sabotaje y a un año de pertinaz sequía. Todo un ejemplo y testimonio vivo en primera línea.

🥰21👍1

10 Dec 2023, 11:59 UTC240 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pulipastorPhoto

CONVOCATORIA PARA APOYAR LA CONTINUIDAD Y LOS VALORES CULTURALES DE ASTILLEROS NEREO. 16 DICIEMBRE 2023 Esta Jornada Patrimonial está abierta a toda la ciudadanía. Será un día para el conocimiento, la reivindicación del patrimonio industrial y la amistad. La carpintería de ribera representada por Astilleros Nereo hunde sus orígenes en la más remota antigüedad. Está constatada, documentalmente, la permanencia de

👍2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @jubrique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,186,103 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JUBRIQUE, JARDÍN DE CHARAXES” (@jubrique), 128 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jubrique.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.