【出击日期】:8.22 【验证人】:wan 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】: 【地区】:厦门 【水费/次】:7 【人照相似】:9 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:10 【服务评分】:8 【情绪价值】:8 【详细描述】:排队排三天 素颜可爱 身材无敌 服务耐心 没有班味 会的姿势不多 但是会尽量配合 鸡蛋里挑骨头就是矮了一点 千言万语都表达不出蛋挞的好 完美已经无需多言 直接给到一个夯爆了 【总结】:无敌 【总体评分】:95 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

Channel
焦糖蛋挞日记
@jtdtrj0815
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
768subscribers
+138 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004363622457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jtdtrj0815 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jtdtrj0815 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 768 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 776 | +34 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 742 | +65 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 677 | +47 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 630 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 630 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【出击日期】:8.22 【验证人】:wan 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】: 【地区】:厦门 【水费/次】:7 【人照相似】:9 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:10 【服务评分】:8 【情绪价值】:8 【详细描述】:排队排三天 素颜可爱 身材无敌 服务耐心 没有班味 会的姿势不多 但是会尽量配合 鸡蛋里挑骨头就是矮了一点 千言万语都表达不出蛋挞的好 完美已经无需多言 直接给到一个夯爆了 【总结】:无敌 【总体评分】:95 【推荐指数】:★★★★★
【出击日期】:8月 【验证人】:超级丝滑 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:700 【人照相似】:10 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】: 一方水土养一方人,这句话是真没错 ,川渝地区的妹妹皮肤是真滴好,滑溜溜没鸡皮肤。身材也很好,细枝结硕果,就是虎皮尖椒纹了个🐯,反差感。 要主动跟妹妹找找话题,沟通没问题,妹子有种破碎感,化妆绝对是个大美人。 👵🏻👵🏻是上翘的仙桃形状,比较少见,动起来duang duang duang的,宅男杀手了。 妹妹的🦵有些僵硬,不够柔软,动起来有些别扭点,其他姿势配合度挺好。美中不足就是没有🐍,可惜了🥲 喜欢小蛋糕可冲。 【总结】: 【总体评分】:9 【推荐指数】:★★★★★
今天预约满了下课休息了。@xiaodanta0815
明天后天还有少量位置提前预约哦 @xiaodanta0815
❤1
【出击日期】:8.21 【验证人】:罗斯福Roosevelt 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:700 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9.5 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】:细枝结硕果,皮肤滑溜溜,就是纹身面积太大了,不过身材真不错,幼嫩,再练练腹肌,等少许时日,也是个小美。不🐍,可以亲,嫩妹嘛,没太多服务不过口的挺舒服。 【总结】: 【总体评分】:9+ 【推荐指数】:★★★★★
❤2
【出击日期】:2026.08 【验证人】:某123表哥 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:厦门湖里万达 【水费/次】:700p 【人照相似】:9.5。素颜与金发照一致,这次是黑发。 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:8.8。本人参考照片,喜欢就直接冲。妹子没有妆造纯靠素颜颜值也能打,肤色偏暖色调,清秀可人,借鉴其他表哥的形容是有点破碎感让人怜惜。 【身材曲线】:细枝硕果,瘦瘦的也有B+或C的天然胸,胸型好看,屁股不大但也很饱满,个子不高约157。 【服务评分】:一般。口技很生疏,当然嫩妹也不要求服务,69没试,要是能🐍就好了。小缺点是这两天开课开多了,后入会怕疼,正面传教她会自己把腿放下来,怕老师是腿疼就没强掰,比较费力。事后据老师说正面倒不是不能抬高一些,纯粹是肢体自然反应。 【情绪价值】:很不错,超乎第一眼印象的健谈,事后听她讲了以前的一些故事。 【详细描述】:素颜如水,谁与流年。清…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
【出击日期】:8.✘ 【验证人】:白 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:厦门 【水费/次】:7 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:素颜 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】:看妹子照片挺喜欢的,加上评价也不错,就约了试试,妹子跟照片素颜那张基本一样,刚好今天也是素颜,底子很好,如果化妆了应该更好看,有一起洗澡,胸c挺软的,摸起来很舒服,皮肤白,下面紧,态度性格各方便都挺好,虽然口活一般,但是口的挺卖力的,做的时候姿势都配合,有时候难受也会忍着,还好我123没太久,总体来说除了不蛇都挺好。 【总结】:除了不蛇都挺好 【总体评分】:9.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★
【出击日期】:8.21 【验证人】:cv 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:7P 【人照相似】:9比照片好看 【目测年龄】:16左右 【颜值妆造】:10 【身材曲线】:10 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:刚进门一个清纯妹子的脸蛋印入眼前,把我惊艳住了,脸蛋白白嫩嫩嫩掐出水。没有化妆素颜脸比照片好看多多,虽然纹了身,但看不出一点精神小妹的样子,没有任何风尘感。真想和这种妹子谈一场恋爱。 交完水费后和妹子一起洗澡,脱了衣服后的胸部很显眼,两个鼓挺挺的双乳给我看馋了,有c左右。又挺又圆真的细枝嫩果,非常标准耐看的🐻。一边帮我擦身体一边问我要不要69,贴心得给我准备好了牙刷。 上床后抱着妹子一般闲聊一般握住双🐻,两只手刚好握住,忍不住戴套步入主题。妹子除了不🐍,其他都非常配合,换了好几个姿势都非常主动。情绪价值给我拉的很满。 …
❤1
【出击日期】:8.20 【验证人】:baibai 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:万达 【水费/次】:700 【人照相似】:没化妆,但是确实不错,很好看 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:素颜打击 【身材曲线】:很赞了,小小一个却很大 【服务评分】:服务可以了,会主动问,主动去做,很赞 【情绪价值】:一开始有点生疏,后面聊两句还是可以的,口音有点好玩,逗逗的,很好的一个妹子 【详细描述】:在妹子刚发照片的时候也是提前先预订好了,两天了终于等到了,也是很不容易,不过确实值得等待,进门就看到可可爱爱的一个小蛋糕妹子,素颜很有邻家女孩的感觉,然后也会主动问你需要什么,态度很赞,可惜的是不能蛇,所以也没主动去亲,脱了衣服发现确实是小小一个,然后大大的,细枝硕果体现出来了,后面也是很配合说什么做什么,不过就是有点呆,姿势什么的没话说,说什么做什么,不过大家还是温柔点,比较这么好的不多见,等会又休…
【出击日期】:2026.8.20 【验证人】:鸭杰克 【老师艺名】:小蛋挞 【老师账号】:@xiaodanta0815 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:700p 【人照相似】:8.8素颜没化妆 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:自然 【身材曲线】:胸超绝 【服务评分】:帮洗搓了搓 【情绪价值】:能聊天,能接话不会很尬 【详细描述】:进门看都不看先进再说,期待这么久包来的,咸口淡口必须尝,找到哥们儿的老板凳坐下直接就是评鉴,妹失望!小小个,可爱的很!原生态很自然!掏水费,聊聊天,直接洗澡,过来帮洗,妹有拒绝,怯生生的搓搓搓,直接上下起手,心里已经开始爽了,出来帮忙口是轻轻的吻,妹什么感觉,口的时候欣赏一下曲线,当真是赏心悦目,这胸又Q又软,直接沉醉,开始做也是很生涩,腿压不下去,不好发力,应该是怕🐍,想亲直接扭头,一边do一边看波浪壮阔也很带劲,下面会烫,应该是前面的哥们儿有好好开发,前面是真没感觉,换后入气好多啪吱啪吱的,哥们…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jtdtrj0815. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“焦糖蛋挞日记” (@jtdtrj0815), 768 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jtdtrj0815.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.