Channel
@jpzdashijian888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002053586045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jpzdashijian888 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jpzdashijian888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 60 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 60 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 2 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2024 to 4 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
苗瓦滴网友听说 kk园区要关了 有官网消息称将军将在10月30以前迁移老巢，一个公司需缴纳10w泰铢3wRMB 一名员工需缴纳6000RMB和3w泰铢消息都放出来了，现在说别的也实在难以置信。 不过对于大部分缅甸华人同胞们来说，我认为这是一笔不小的开销，大家应该也不会跟随的，以至于一些盘总们不得不走的那些应该是会执行这一系列安排的 PS：小编表示，小道消息，目前此内容真实性不做保证
❤1
又是天灾 又是人祸的，缅甸老百姓还要怎么活！！！ 现场直升机实拍缅甸密之那 受灾水灾状况。 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
👍1
今天（7月1日）起，掸邦北部昔卜－腊戌之间的辛茵和渡口暂时暂停摆渡。民众通行往来时可走腊戌－南榜－孟崖－班扭－南兰－皎古－班贝路。不清楚渡口为何暂停摆渡，但应该和皎梅、瑙丘战事有关。 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
👍1
#曝光悬赏5万u 人在大其力，抓到此2人悬赏5wU，不管人在哪里，尸体送到亚太，10wu、送到亚太！ 领钱热线：@Gb163816 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
妙瓦底三号区抓到个小偷，直接把他挂在墙上 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
#曝光佤邦孟波瓦世界酒店 #一个公司员工 #外号都叫他老张 去年做国内商城盘组长 去年公司搬到老街去在那边活不下去到处找人借钱 找我借了10000块钱 从二月份到现在一直拖不还 钱不多 但是真的很气人 到处欠债 说自己认识谁认识谁 到最后什么牛马也不是 24号说30号给我还把我骂了一顿 今天去找他直接把我拉黑 各位兄弟 在这种地方真的不要借钱出去 管他去死 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
#网友补上 照片信息来源：网络自媒体 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
#网友投稿 胶脉市 目前现状 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
#网友投稿 根据当地百姓透露 ，缅军扎住在抹眉市民房，射击过路的人，虽然抹眉还没有发生攻城战，但是缅军已经入驻民房，并开始射击过路人。 ———————————————————- 西港聊天群：https://t.me/ATMliaotian 投稿飞机：@xiaoxin13145
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @jpzdashijian888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,437,068 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jpzdashijian888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“验钞机- 新闻 爆料（吃瓜）总群” (@jpzdashijian888), 60 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpzdashijian888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.