这种话说白了还是看乐子图嘴快欺负高中生而已,潜台词是高考这么重要的事都能出错,对自己不负责任。人家今年才 18 岁,这次没准备好还有明年呢,而步入社会的网友们要是工作出错被裁了,那可能就真的再也找不到合适的工作了。
😇6😭2

Channel
@jpkxt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
421subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002114460212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jpkxt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jpkxt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 421 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 418 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 416 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 419 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 415 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 416 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 417 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 417 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
144 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 109 | 75.7% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 7.64% | |
| 😇 | 9 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.694% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.694% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.694% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这种话说白了还是看乐子图嘴快欺负高中生而已,潜台词是高考这么重要的事都能出错,对自己不负责任。人家今年才 18 岁,这次没准备好还有明年呢,而步入社会的网友们要是工作出错被裁了,那可能就真的再也找不到合适的工作了。
😇6😭2
每年高考都有考生忘带身份证准考证,网友一般会评论说这种直接保送电子厂美团。但我觉得这种一点攻击力都没有,因为版本已经更新了,现在考个双非,毕业找不到工作照样电子厂美团啊,考上了又能怎么样呢?
😭4😇3
虚假的特征:重放、TLS 指纹 真正的特征:你一直连着一个境外服务器
😁22
原 @bugdows 频道因为主播上一个号炸了所以现在处于无人驾驶状态。欢迎大家关注新的 Windows Slop 频道 @slopdows 获取最新的 Windows Slop。
😁2❤1🥰1
你的散列算法是 SHA512 加密算法是抗量子,但你的 API 没有做鉴权又弥补了这一点
😁6
所以怪不得很多电影电视剧里神秘黑客破解电脑几分钟就搞定了,未来的软件都是 ai 写的全是漏洞,那还真就几分钟就破解了
👏3
所以这时候是黑客 u 盘里装的 LLM 在扫描漏洞吗
😁4😱1
由于大黑塔接入博识尊时出现了差错,铁墓病毒没有被彻底消灭。微星 B850M 系列主板的板载网卡受到宇宙间残存的铁墓病毒影响,会不定期无法识别到网线或协商速率卡在 100M 全双工。解决方法是: 1. 关机 2. 拔掉电源线 3. 关闭电源开关 4. 长按开机键 30 秒以上 5. 打开电源开关 6. 插入电源线 7. 开机 这样你的微星 B850M 主板中的铁墓病毒就会被清除,网卡工作恢复正常。 参考文献: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threads/b850-tomahawk-ethernet-random-drops-issue.415328/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MSI_Gaming/comments/1j8lpxi/b850_tomahawk_wifi_max_random_ethernet_drop/ https://community.spi…
😁1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoag03mSuXQ
接下来我将要随意的组合、嵌套、混淆各种传输层和不安全的加密方法并不给出 benchmark,严谨的翻墙学家可能会发出尖锐的爆鸣声,但是不用去理会他们,现实中不存在这样变态的翻墙环境
😁10
指的是,在 XVSC(Xray、V2fly、sing-box、Clash)公理框架内,存在这样的协议,你无法证明它不会被墙,也无法证明它会被墙
😁4
翻墙不完备定理
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jpkxt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“箭牌口香糖” (@jpkxt), 421 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpkxt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.