Channel
@jotadotnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
382subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001289404433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jotadotnet |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jotadotnet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 382 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 381 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 381 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 45.5% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 41.8% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2025 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Of course, there were ups and downs. Some months were incredibly profitable, while others were challenging - that's the reality of betting, no matter what so-called "gurus" claim. The key has always been consistency and smart decision-making. For quite some time, I have been considering stepping away from the group. Life has changed for me in many ways over the years, and running a betting community is vastly differ…
❤18👏4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
⚠️ Important Announcement Dear everyone, I have been involved in sports betting since a very young age, always with the knowledge and support of my parents. Initially, it was just a way to add excitement to watching games while developing my analytical and perceptive skills. However, as I grew older, I began to take it more seriously, dedicating more time and increasing my investments as it proved to be a profitabl…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
💰 We wrapped up our last bet of the day with ease! The Israel vs Norway match saw 6 goals, comfortably surpassing our target, while the South American clash delivered 10 yellow cards - double the 5 we needed. A perfect analysis leading to an effortless win! On this beautiful Saturday, I have 3 more free bets for you. BOL! ⚽ @2.37 odd - 3% bankroll: Both Teams To Score in Frankfurt vs Stuttgart Real Madrid to score i…
🔥1
🗣️ On the 20th, both favourites, Portugal and France, fell short with 1-0 and 2-0 losses, respectively, despite going through due to the 2nd leg's results. As you know, I tend to avoid betting during International Breaks, which is why I haven't shared many picks lately - and the ones I've shared were exclusively on the Premium. That said, I’ve found a bet I really like for today: - 11 of Norway’s last 12 matches have…
🔥3
💰 On February 16th, the final day of club competitions before the international break - and our last day of bets - we had a perfect day as we cashed all 3 bets, securing a profit of 13.16%! 🔥 As we kick off the international break, I’ve lined up 5 pre-match bets, from which I'll share 3 with you today, featuring a mix of football and tennis (Miami Open). Let’s keep the momentum going - best of luck, and let's cash i…
❤1
🗣️ Yesterday, we were on the verge of a clean sweep but ended up with a modest profit (+1.74%). Bayern, who had won 6 of their last 7 encounters against Union Berlin, controlled the game but conceded a late equalizer. Meanwhile, in a shocking turn of events, Lille - unbeaten in their last 19 matchups against Nantes - lost 1-0, despite playing against 10 men! 🔥 Today's slate is smaller, and some games are already und…
🔥2
🤑 Thursday was absolutely incredible, as we hit 4 out of 5 free bets, securing a massive 15.98% profit - an outstanding result! Still, the sweep was just out of reach, with 1 goal missing in two matches: Vini Jr. missed a penalty, leading to Real Madrid failing to score - a rare sight, considering they had netted in 25 of their last 26 games; Rangers, despite scoring 3 in the reverse fixture (away), couldn't score at…
🔥2
😱 I have no doubt that this knockout fixture between Liverpool and PSG was one of the most profitable ever for the sportsbooks. Both games were supposed to have multiple goals, and they did not disappoint in terms of show and chances created, but both finished 0-1. Regarding yesterday's game, it was the first time since 2023 that Liverpool did not score at home despite attempting 19 shots and having almost 2 expected…
🔥1
🗣️ Saturday’s results were nothing short of bizarre. All 3 heavy favorites - Bayern, Leverkusen, and Dortmund - lost at home, with 2 failing to score a single goal. Even Villarreal lost 1-0 to Alavés, a team that had only won 2 of their last 20 league matches, despite playing against 10 men for 50 minutes and even finishing the game with a 2-man advantage for the final 14 minutes! 🧠 Normally, I’d break down each pic…
👍1
📝 On Thursday, we were quite unfortunate due to how we lost the fi rst 2 bets: Fenerbahçe were unbeaten in their last 18 matches and had never tasted defeat against a Scottish opponent but lost 1-3 despite attempting the triple of Rangers' shots; 4 of AZ’s 5 UEL home games this season had seen both teams score, as did all 4 of Tottenham’s away UEL matches, but AZ Alkmaar won 1-0 even though they had lost 12 of their …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jotadotnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jota.net Ultimate Betting Tips” (@jotadotnet), 382 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jotadotnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.