3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 07:39
106
+1
9 Aug 2026, 09:02
105
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:52
105
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
192.1%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
2,647
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
127 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
70.1%
👍
24
18.9%
💔
6
4.72%
😁
4
3.15%
🔥
3
2.36%
👌
1
0.787%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شهيد حميد رضا رجب زاده
خبر دارید از ماجرای شهادتش؟!
هیچ رسانه ای راجع به دزدیده شدن این بنده خدا حرفی زد؟! حالا هم که میگن سلطی ها گرفتنش و شکنجه اش کردن و میگن تیک تیکش کردن خدا کنه دروغ باشه خدا کنه !!!!!
اگر الان جای شهید رجب زاده هر كس دیگه ای از زن و مرد کشته شده بودالان حزب اللهی و غیره و صورتی و بنفش داشتن خودشون رو جر میدادن الان باید مشهد فراخوان بدن خونه به خونه رو بگردن تمامی حرام زادهای که تو جریانات دس…
آنقدر از اتفاقات اخیر دلسرد شدهایم که حوصلهای برای نوشتن و تحلیل سیاسی نمانده اما فقط یک نکته را باید یادآوری کرد:
آمریکا ثابت کرده که چه وسط توافق و چه بعد از آن، ضربه کاریکاتوری نمیزند و آسیب جدی وارد میکند!
حالا کسانی که هنوز میگویند برویم و با امپریالیسم ببندیم، نادان یا سادهلوح نیستند
بلکه دقیقاً در نقش نیروهای نیابتی عمل میکنند
حتی اگر در تراز مسئولان مملکتی باشند. توافق سوم در راه است!
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
…
بچه های میناب یادتون نبود، خون سربازای این مملکت که آمریکا ریخت یادتون نبود، حالا واسه دو تا قا°تل حرام لقمه #نه_به_اعدام میزنید و استوری علیه جمهوری اسلامی میذارید؟
جوزی𝕏
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
چهارتا از بهترین های هوش مصنوعی در تلگرام
@JWGPT3_bot (محدودیت)
@deepseek_gidbot (رایگان)
چت و ساخت تصویر
@chatgpt_gidbot
@nanobanana_gidbot
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
تمام شرق و غرب باهم به عراق بعثی تجهیزات و اطلاعات ميدادن
منافقين در داخل کمکشان میکردن
هشت سال جنگیدیم مقابلشان
بعد تو حرام لقمه میگی ۱۲۰۰ میلیارد بودجه جنگشه تکنولوژی فلان داره !!! چه جوری میخواهی جلوش بجنگیم ؟!
#سیاسی_حرف_نمیزنم
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
خائن ها به آسانی کنار ما زندگی میکنند!
تهویج میکنند!
نظریه ارائه میدهند!
ضربه میزنند!
بدون ترس از تبعاتش!
تا کی باید خیانت بکنند بدونه محاكمه ؟!
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
متاسفانه! بیسوادی رسانه ای که اجازه برنامه سازی به موگوی داده حالیش نیست! که حالیش نیست! حالا چرا سریع و دسپاچه اینو دادن بیرون که بگن اهای ملت عراقچی خائن نیست ! اما حرف مردم کف خیابان اینکه هرکی از سازش حرف بزنه خائن هست!
نگاه اینا خیلی مادی بدونه توجه به توکل و توسل هست فقط دوتا چهارتای امضای کری تضمین هست تمام اندیشه های ظریف در صحبتهای عراقچی موج میزنه!!!
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
فردای پیروزی جنگ همینهای که نه به جنگ میگفتند همینهای که صبح تا شب از مذاکره و تسلیم حرف میزدند همینهای که پرچم داران خیابان را مسخره میکردند همینهای که صحبت از اتمام انقلاب و مقاومت میکردند می آیند و خود را شریک پیروزی میدادند وسهم پیروزی میخواهند!
┄┄┅┅┅❅❁❅┅┅┅┄┄
@josephbeyk6
❤5👍3
Signed جوزی 𝕏➢
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @josephbeyk6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محفل جوزی” (@josephbeyk6), 106 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/josephbeyk6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.