Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لـِ جُودِي

Channel

لـِ جُودِي

@joq_d_13

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

877subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003938139997
TypeChannel
Username@joq_d_13
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 11 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/joq_d_13

Growth

846877861.57 August 2026 — 850 subscribers8 August 2026 — 850 subscribers8 August 2026 — 846 subscribers15 August 2026 — 877 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 841–882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:54877+31
8 Aug 2026, 16:03846-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:19850no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:28850first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.2%
avg views ÷ 877 subscribers
Avg views / post
835
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (11 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,182
Reactions total572
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,064 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 595190721140700672721520.2%
custom 601696168088018221216715.7%
custom 597195626047865548115914.9%
custom 592913893693588178714813.9%
custom 593838253119059573613012.2%
custom 547416625233739691912912.1%
custom 584584098398759314911610.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,064reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
245
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 19 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @joq_d_13. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC460 views116 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

يدي حنونة لكنّي اجيد القسوة واُقسم اني أُتقِنُها بطريقةٍ لا تليقُ بحنيتي❤️‍🔥 لـِ جُودِي | ٧:٢٧

custom 5845840983987593149116

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

3 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC622 views0 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026

ما أقسى أن تُطفئ عامًا كاملًا من عمرك تحت مصباحٍ لا ينام، ثم تُخبرك ورقةٌ صغيرة أنّ كلَّ ذلك لم يكن كافيًا. ها أنا أرسب للمرة الثانية... وكأنَّ العمر يعيد إليَّ الخسارة ذاتها بوجهٍ جديد. أُحصي الليالي التي سَهِرتُها، والأيام التي دفنتُها بين الكتب، فأشعر أنني لم أخسر امتحانًا فحسب، بل فقدتُ قطعةً من روحي كانت تؤمن أن هذه المرّة ستكون مختلفة. لا شيء يؤلم أكثر من أن ترى حلمك واقفًا أمامك... ثم يُغلق الباب في وجهك للمر

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

2 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC840 views167 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𓏺 ࠝ𝑾𝒆 𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝑳𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑳𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝑳𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔, 𝒀𝒆𝒕 𝑾𝒆 𝑨𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝑶𝒖𝒓 𝑨𝒓𝒓𝒐𝒘𝒔 𝑳𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒓𝒔 🤩 𝟏𝟐:𝟏𝟐 | 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒅𝒊

custom 6016961680880182212167

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

1 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC855 views0 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

لا أريد أن أندفع مرّةً أخرى. فالمرّة الأخيرة، حين وثقتُ بما شعرتُ أكثر ممّا ينبغي، انتهيتُ أسير في الشوارع بلا وجهة، كغريبٍة عن جسدها وأجر خلفي ندمًا كان أثقل من أن يحمله صدرٌ واحد أحاول أن أتذكّر كيف يكون التنفّس، بينما كان الندم يطبق على صدري كيدٍ لا تعرف الرحمة. لـِ جُودِي ١٢:١٢

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

1 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC754 views0 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

حَريقٌ حَولي ولَستُ أدري هَل النَارُ مِنهُ أمْ تِلكْ مِني ؟ 🤩 لـِ جُودِي | ٥:٥٥

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

30 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC≈1,030 views0 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

سُبحان من برقيقِ الخُلُقِ حلّاكِ 🌟 . لـِ جُودِي | ٣:٣٤ ص

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

28 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,230 views130 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

واحدة من الاعترافات اللي لازم أعترف فيها عن عيوبي في العلاقات... هو إني لو لقيتك ما بتحكي معي، أنا كمان مش رح أحكي معك . الموضوع ما الو أي علاقة بأني ما بدي أحكي معك أو بثقل عليك، لا والله... الفكرة كلها إني بترجم سكوتك هذا على إنك مش حابب تحكي معي، فبقدّر إني اترك مساحتك، ومستحيل أفرض نفسي عليك عشان ما أكون بضايقك أو حاسة إني ثقيلة الموضوع متعب، بس حقيقي بيكون نابع من قمة التقدير والمحبة، مش التجاهل .

custom 5938382531190595736130

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

27 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC831 views159 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

بتذكر شو مشينا ؟ مشينا و حكينا ! تارينا رجعنا متل ما بدينا .! و عم تلغي ماضينا لبعدوا عايش فينا ؟ عم تنسى و كأن لا رحنا ولا جينا أحلى شي فيك اللي معلقني فيك إنو كذبك بيتصدق هيك خليك كذبك حلو شو حلو لما كنت شي كذبة بحياتك كذبك حلو تذكرني شي مرة و رجعني ع بالك . . . . ميادة بسيليس

custom 5971956260478655481159

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

26 Jul 2026, 02:55 UTC≈1,450 views0 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

مضى الفراقُ، ولكنّي ما مضيتُ عن الهوى، فما كلُّ من رحلَ عن العينِ قد رحلَ عن صداه. سألتُ قلبي عنه ألفَ مرةٍ، فيجيبني بصمتٍ: بعضُ الأحبّةِ لا ننساهُم وإن نسونا. ما زلتُ أبحثُ بين صمتهِ عن بقايا حكايةٍ، وعن قلبٍ كان بالأمسِ يعرفُ كيف يطمئنّ بي. فإن كان حبّي قد أثقلَ خُطاهُ، فلماذا تركَ في روحي كلَّ هذا الثقل؟ وإن كان قد نسيَ الطريقَ إليّ، فلماذا ما زلتُ أجدُه في كلِّ الطرقات ؟ مضى الوقتُ، لكنَّ السؤالَ ما زالَ يسكنني:

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

24 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC880 views0 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

لم تُذرف عيناي الدموع ساعة افترقنا، لا لأن الفقد لم يؤلمني، بل لأن قلبي كان يومها كتلةً من نار، لا يجرؤ أحد على الاقتراب منها سواك. أما الآن، فأنثى النار تبكي كل نبضة في صدرها تنادي اسمك، وكل احتراقٍ في فؤادها يهمس: عد أرجوك. لكن إيّاك أن تُصغي إلى رجاء القلب فإن عدت يومًا، فلن تجد سوى أبوابٍ أوصدتها قسوتي بيدي لقد كانت تلك آخر فرصة منحتها لقلبين أرهقهما الانتظار، ولن يكون بعد اليوم بابٌ يُطرق ولا فرصةٌ تُعاد. كنتَ ط

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

23 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC664 views0 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026

وهل كنتُ يومًا سوى نبضٍ سكنَ فؤادَه ؟ أم أنّني كنتُ ذكرى مرّتْ على مهلٍ ونساهَا ؟ أكان البُعدُ نهايةَ ما بيننا ؟ أم كان خوفًا خبّأَ القلبُ خفاياهَا ؟ ما زلتُ أبحثُ في صمتِه عن إجابةٍ، فبعضُ الغيابِ لا يُنهي الحكايا بل يُخفي بقاياهَا. وإن كان حبّي قد أثقلَ روحه، فكيف لقلبي أن ينسى اليدَ التي احتوتْ شتاتَهَا ؟ وهل يُطفئُ النسيانُ نارًا أشعلَتْها يداه ؟ وهل يعودُ القلبُ غريبًا بعدما كان مأواه ؟ لـِ جُودِي | ١٢:١٢ ص

Signed 𓏺 ࠝ𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐃𝐈 ֢

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @joq_d_13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 493,447 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لـِ جُودِي” (@joq_d_13), 877 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/joq_d_13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.