Channel
@jonikuyar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003784354015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jonikuyar |
| Description | Maqsadimiz bir – pul! Mualliflik huquqi asosidagi shaxsiy qarash va fikrlar, qoralama, hajviya-hangoma, maqola va hikoyalar. Eskartish: Muallif fikri sizning nuqtayi nazaringizdan farq qilishi mumkin. Hech nimaga da’vo qilinmas. |
| Created | 2 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jonikuyar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 40 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 40 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 March 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,880 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
44 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 45.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tili harom Balki bundan keyingi yozg‘irlar o‘quvchiga tanishdir. Bil’aks, og‘zingiz lang ochilib, yoqangiz yirtilib ketmasin. Qishlog‘imizdagi men bilgan xotinlarning bari shu bo‘lsa, farzandini erkalatganini ko‘rmagan, chiroyliroq gap aytganini eshitmagan ekanman. “Otangga o‘xshamay o‘l, haromdan bo‘lgan!”, “Qoningni ichaman!”, “Yer yutgur!”, “Sen eshakni...”, “O‘ynashdan bo‘lgan!”, “Ho‘kiz!”, “Mol!”, “Og‘zingdan …
👍3
*** …Nafsilamrini aytganda, yaxshilab razm solsang, dorilangan gulga o‘xshaydi. Na hidlab bo‘ladi, na teginib. Uzoqdan qarasang hayvoniy hirsni uyg‘otishdan boshqasiga yaramaydi. Uyg‘otishga uyg‘otadi-yu, yaqinroq borsang ko‘nglingni buzib, dilingni xira qilib tashlaydi. Yana ustiga shakliga ma’lum latta-puttalarni ilib oladiki, “Astofrilloh” deb qolasan. Nima qilib bularga qarab yuribsan, deysizmi? Xotin ham shu sa…
Sizlarni bilmadim, ammo men juda bir boshqacha hayajon his qildim oʻzimda. Necha yillar orziqib kutilgan lahzalar a, faxrlandim. Xudoyimning oʻzi kuch-quvvat bersin Oq boʻrilarga. @jonikuyar
👍2
Senatdan oʻrnak olish kerak ekan) # @jonikuyar
😁2
AQSH shu paytgacha odamlardan yashirib kelingan fayllarni ochiqlayotgan ekan. Bu yerda oʻzga sayyoraliklar, qandaysir uchar jismlar, tarilkalar haqida gap ketyapti. Kichkina odamchalar, deydimi, ishqilib, ishonishni ham, ishonmaslikni ham bilmaysan kishi. @jonikuyar
Samarqand viloyati Ishtixon tumanida ikki bola xatna qilinganidan keyin vafot etibdi. Essiz, juda afsuslandim. Shuncha sa'y-harakatlarga qaramay, viloyatlar tumanlarida hali ham tibbiyot achinarli bir holda qolmoqda. Men ham o‘g‘illarimni xatna qildirganman. Faqat zamonaviy tibbiyot, sinalga usul va bir necha bor ishonchdan o‘tgan ustalariga. Avval bolani bir-ikki hafta aldab, psixologik tayyorlaganman. Keyin eng m…
Hayot falsafasini qaranki, doim ham yaxshi boʻlish yaramaydi. Qishloq hovlimizda 3 ta itimiz bor edi, bari katta-katta. Akam ularni boʻribosar boʻladi, deb atayin Urgutdan oldirib, kichikligidan parvarishladi. Aytilganidek chiqmaga boʻlsa-da, vaqt oʻtib begona odamni yaxshigina choʻchitadigan jasadga ega boʻlishdi it tushmagurlar. Uchalasidan biri odam tishlaydigan, tishlamasa ham tashlanib turadigan odat chiqardi.…
👍5👏2😢1
Qaytish... Qaniydi imkoning bo‘lsa, qurbing yetsa-da ota-onangga chet ellarni ko‘rsatib kelsang. Davringda dunyoni ko‘rsalar senga dunyoni ko‘rsatganlar. Qaniydi… …Ayam bilan telefonda gaplashdim. Qishloqda chiroq o‘chibdi. Aytishicha, kuniga 3-4 soat o‘chayotgan ekan. Men keng va yorug‘ shaharning qoq o‘rtasida, ishdan qaytib mashina boshqarib ketayotgan edim. Rul chambaragini g‘ichirlatib mahkam qisaman. “Bekor!”…
❤4😢4
Arzim shulki, Beklar yurtida orli-g‘ururli yigitlarimiz kamayib, o‘rniga ming taqlidchi, erkaknamo, ayolsifatlari kun sayin ko‘payib borayotganidan xavotirdaman. Odamlarimiz ichida erlar xotiniga beparvo, qizlar “sevgiparaz”: andisha pardasi ko‘tarilib, ibo-hayo arazlab ketgan. Ba’zi og‘a-inilarimizda milliy g‘urur, o‘zbekona mentalitet, vatanparvarlik tuyg‘ulari unut bo‘layozdi. Mehr-oqibat ko‘tarildi. Gadoning to‘r…
👏3🔥2
Julqunboyga arznoma Ba’zi bir vatandoshlarimga! Batqaldoq xo‘ja: – Hoy eshon, biz ham endi ancha taraqqiy qilibmiz-a?! Lo‘kidon xo‘ja: – Qayoqdan bildingiz? – Xotunlarimiz nos o‘rnig‘a popiro‘s cheka boshlabdurlar. – Qayoqda ko‘rdingiz? – Qayoqda ko‘rar edim, sentralniy mo‘ncha(hammom)da ko‘rdim... “Mushtum” – 1923-yil, 3-son Ey, Qodiriy bobo men aytmay, siz kuymang. Hozir “sentralniy mo‘ncha”lar shahar tugul, ovl…
Norin yemasligimga sabab bo‘lgan qissa To‘g‘irisini aytsam, avvaldan bu taomni uncha xushlamayman. Tog‘ay Murodning "Ot kishnagan oqshom" qissasini o‘qiganimdan keyin esa norindan butkul voz kechganman, qaziga qarolmayman. Balki shuning uchundir tamaddixonalarda norin buyurtma qilganlar menda tulporlarni vahshiylarcha tishlab-tishlab yeyayotgandek tasavvur uyg‘otadi. Qissadagi ot bilan bevosita bog‘liq ajoyib syujet…
❤🔥3👍2
Onamga maktub Jonimdan azizim, borlig‘im, borim. Qaddingizni ko‘taring, men keldim, ona! Tizzangizni bering boshimni qo‘yay, mehringizga to‘yib ko‘nglimni ochay. Sizni o‘n yil yolg‘iz qoldirib, ketdim, Toshkan tomon, “buyuk” kelajakni izlab. Yurdim tentirab, soddalik qilib. O‘zimcha tashabbuslar, chinakam ishlar bilib. Ishonibman, yaxshi kadr har doim kerakligiga, tinmay o‘qidim, vijdonan ishladim. Lekin zoyi ketga…
👍3❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @jonikuyar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 295,966 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Joni KUYAR” (@jonikuyar), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jonikuyar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.