Channel
@jollyconfdaily
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
135subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003643534622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jollyconfdaily |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jollyconfdaily |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 135 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 136 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 136 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (17 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,294 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 33.7% | |
| custom 5895688765266991706 | 28 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5895634652974028679 | 14 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5895516433999206348 | 13 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5895625169686240000 | 8 | 7.69% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.962% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
»» New post «« #joll #тейк Парные аватарки Джей долл💜💜🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ 💿 — с кем поставить —— —— —— —— cr: @h1rox_x adm: @ 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙
custom 58955164339992063483custom 58956346529740286793custom 58956887652669917063custom 58956251696862400002❤🔥1
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙`[they/them]
»» New post «« #joll #тейк Эээ ну там упоминание РПП будьте осторожны если штo И да приветвсем . Я думала над тем, какое тело было бы у Джей и Долл в человеческих версиях, и попытаюсь объяснить, почему так подумала! В общем, я решила для себя, что будь дроны рабочие людьми, то они были бы скорее киборгами, чем полностью мясными котлетками (для демонтажников). Если мы почти не отрекаемся от канона, то у них в бу…
custom 58956887652669917065custom 58955164339992063482custom 58956251696862400001custom 58956346529740286791
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙`[they/them]
»» New post «« #joll #тейк *Эээа мне нечего кинуть сюда так шо. Гача лайф... Мне не хочется их доделывать потому шо не умею ничего —— —— —— —— cr: (@kori_930) adm: наркоша
custom 58956346529740286794custom 58955164339992063482custom 58956251696862400001custom 58956887652669917061
»» New post «« #joll #тейк оло оло 📞 хуем по лбу мне не дало Я немного поразмыслила и решила, что джолл в мужской версии были бы забавными! Типа, боже, представьте парня-Джей, который очень старается быть крутым, но срывается на всех. И Долл, что, по моему мнению, будет также более вспыльчивым и открыто грубым. Ну это просто мои влажные фантазии... Но в таком случае Долл была бы (или, наверное, стоит говорить …
custom 58956887652669917066💊2custom 58955164339992063481custom 58956346529740286791
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙`[they/them]
»» New post «« #joll #тейк ЛАн я скину вам те доски с пинтереста но не думайте что я хороша в этом https://pin.it/2VjKQ6g1E И https://pin.it/4M45PTojh —— —— —— —— cr: @Kori_930 adm: наркоша
custom 58956887652669917063❤🔥1
»» New post «« #joll #тейк Пр, я наконец-то нашла время для любимой джолл и в голову почему то придумала это💀 Неанон Решётка —— —— —— —— cr: @Girdzzz adm: наркоша
custom 58956887652669917065custom 58955164339992063482custom 58956251696862400002custom 58956346529740286792💊1
»» New post «« #joll #тейк *Ребята я умерла и мои тейки хуйня, терпите ТАК ВОТ я придумала диагнозы для этих двоих для human au ок? Дальше много матов (!!) Джей с ОКР и НРЛ (Обсессивно-Компульсивное Расстройство и Нарциссическое Расстройство Личности) — Объясню свой выбор тем, что я вижу её только на руководящих должностях, а выполнять назначенную роль и убиваться по работе, когда отдыхает, характеризуют её…
Signed 𝓼𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓬𝓱🪷
»» New post «« #joll #тейк У меня джолли головного мозга. Кстати у меня есть доски в пинтересте про дже и длль могу скинуть ... Но не думайте, что они хорошие, я это делаю только потому, шо контента нет для вас... —— —— —— —— cr: @Kori_932 adm: @ 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙
custom 58956887652669917062
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙 `[they/them] #funnybunnydoll_kisser
https://t.me/boost/jollyconfdaily 💿 - проголосуйте, пожалуйста, у кого есть возможность, а я добавлю несколько новых реактов вам 🌟🌟
custom 58955164339992063483custom 58956346529740286793custom 58956887652669917063custom 58956251696862400002
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙 `[they/them] #funnybunnydoll_kisser
»» New post «« #joll #art —— —— —— —— cr: @SolverGhost on X adm: @ 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙
❤🔥4
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙 `[they/them] #funnybunnydoll_kisser
»» New post «« #joll #тейк Блин, если представить хьюман ау с Джей именно как офисную сирену, ну или по-другому руководителем какого-то потока гōвна в офисе, то сводить её с Долл... Мягко говоря, было бы в некоторой степени муторной задачей!Представьте человека, который наплевательски относится ко многим намёкам, нормам и немым правилам общества. И рядом Джей, что обязана (по крайней мере, она так считает) переигр…
❤🔥2
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙 `[they/them] #funnybunnydoll_kisser
Posted without readable text
Signed » 𝙙𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙 `[they/them] #funnybunnydoll_kisser
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @jollyconfdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,267,702 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jollyconfdaily named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•° 𝐣𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙮 cf & 𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 °•” (@jollyconfdaily), 135 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jollyconfdaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.