Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for jollop

Channel

jollop

@jollop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

-22,893 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001712620504
TypeChannel
Username@jollop
Created28 August 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jollop

Growth

122,90211,451.513 August 2026 — 22,902 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,898 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,888 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,878 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,867 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,845 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9 subscribers913 August 202628 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 14 days, net -22,893. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:259+8
21 Aug 2026, 08:431-22,844
19 Aug 2026, 07:0822,845-22
18 Aug 2026, 08:1122,867-11
17 Aug 2026, 09:3722,878-10
15 Aug 2026, 18:2222,888-10
14 Aug 2026, 06:3622,898-4
13 Aug 2026, 20:5122,902first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 28 August 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2882.7%
avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held47 (28 August 202320 August 2026)
Views total8,821
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 53s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53593670249653526732614.5%
👍2212.3%
❤‍🔥2111.7%
🔥1910.6%
custom 5438619174555391748168.94%
custom 6226371543065167427158.38%
custom 5258398069027805747116.15%
🆒116.15%
custom 544086359132029400195.03%
custom 546546519405652561973.91%
63.35%
custom 543861490106293010752.79%
👏42.23%
😁31.68%
custom 535976625935538946021.12%
🎃10.559%
🏆10.559%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2023 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,312
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 45 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3,310
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jollop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 August 2023 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

جديد للروت KOS الاصلي 🎱✅ السعر للعراق🇮🇶 يوم 🔹 3الف 7ايام 🔹 10الف 15ايام 🔹 15الف 30ايام 🔹25الف مميزات الهاگ 🎭 لعب تلقائي🚀 امن(بشري-سريع-9كرات) دخول طاولات 8كرات-9كرات💡👑 (اختيارات متعدة) لعب كولدن شوت بدقة عالية تشغيل نسخة اخر اصدار من متجر بلي✅ تطبيق وليس نسخة ✅ للشراء تواصل 💳 🔤🔤🔤 @xx_raes

1🔥1custom 54386191745553917481

19 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC157 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54386191745553917482🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC253 viewsread 21 August 2026

⚠️حسابي الرسمي والوحيد⚠️ @xx_raes ✅ انتبه من المنتحلين لا املك حسابات اخرى او قناة اخرى وغير مسؤل عنها انتبه انتبه⚠️⚠️ جميع قنواتي اضغط للأنضمام https://t.me/addlist/ZP8Nc5WoMsU1ZjIy

19 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC199 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

توفر هاگ نينجا الاصلي 🏴‍☠️☠️ سعر اشتراك لدولة العراق 3ايام ب10الف✅ اسبوع 20الف✅ شهر 35 الف✅ شهرين 60 الف✅ 90يوم 85الف✅ 😀طرق الدفع دولة العراق ماستر-اسياسيل-زين كاش-fib🔗 مميزات هاگ نينجا لعب تلقائي (2 اوضاع ولعب بالذكاء الاصطناعي امن) ☠️ دخول طاولات تلقائي (تحديد اختياري) ☠️ كشف نسبة توقع الكسرة اذا يمك او لا الهاك الوحيد فيه الميزة 👻 يدعم تسجيل دخول كوكل وفيس 🔫 حماية قوية🟢 تشغيل لعبة اصلية من متجر بلاي 🟢 ميزة Snooker

18 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC247 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

توفرت حسابات 500m على 5الف @xx_raes

🆒2😁1custom 54386191745553917481

17 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC414 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

مميزات الحسابات 1B 🎭 ✅ مستوى الحسابات عشوائية من 65 فما فوق عشوائي ✅ كوينز 1B ✅ نظامي مو مصنف يعني مايطلع شـيتو ضـدك ✅ ربط كوكل فقط + ✅ بول باص من تفتح حساب يجيك سعر الحساب 10 الف عراقي🇮🇶 متاح كميات 🥇 @xx_raes

🆒3

16 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC413 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

لمعرفة تفاصيل اكثر تواصل معي متوفر طرق دفع من جميع انحاء العالم ⏩ @xx_raes 🛒 For more details, please contact me. Payment methods are available from all over the world. ⏩ @xx_raes🛒

custom 543861917455539174821😁1🆒1

16 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54386191745553917483🆒1

16 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC421 viewsread 20 August 2026

⚠️حسابي الرسمي والوحيد⚠️ @xx_raes ✅ انتبه من المنتحلين لا املك حسابات اخرى او قناة اخرى وغير مسؤل عنها انتبه انتبه⚠️⚠️ جميع قنواتي اضغط للأنضمام https://t.me/addlist/ZP8Nc5WoMsU1ZjIy

16 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC121 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

حساب بليارد مليارين كوينز سعره 20الف @xx_raes

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @jollop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 351,000 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“jollop” (@jollop), 9 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jollop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.