Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ﹫ 𝗝𝗢lya переезд

Channel

﹫ 𝗝𝗢lya переезд

@jojolya1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002759750613
TypeChannel
Username@jojolya1
Description( ヽ ⑅ ( ヽ gosangeee . х ꒰ ⸝⸝ ˊ ^ ˋ ⸝⸝ ꒱ t.me/argentiswife
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jojolya1

Growth

8215 Aug 2026, 12:33 — 82 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 12:45 — 82 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 12:3315 Aug 2026, 12:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:4582no change
15 Aug 2026, 12:3382first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
209
Videos
26
Links
111

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓4720.3%
custom 54631488365894313764017.2%
🌭3615.5%
💋3113.4%
custom 52649531383092438742812.1%
custom 5332355756597466908229.48%
custom 5350503436532073409114.74%
💘52.16%
custom 520855612460895575031.29%
custom 523574929343175152831.29%
custom 534840890553586454220.862%
🦄20.862%
custom 523590476265792943010.431%
🌚10.431%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 May 2026, 02:51 UTC252 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

. ᛝ 💜💜💜 ៸ ៸ NEW POST ﹙🎁﹚ 😻 #hsr #video 🤩#зарянка

🌭11🍓11💋11💘5🦄2

26 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC555 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

. ᛝ 🌟🌟 ៸ ៸ NEW POST ﹙🎁﹚ 😻 #hsr #video 🤩#бутхилл / #аргенти , #аргенхиллы.

🍓17💋17🌭16

26 Apr 2026, 18:20 UTC176 viewsread 15 August 2026

хотите я сюда все-таки буду постить

17 Apr 2026, 19:57 UTC219 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

. ⁽ 💽💽💽 ៸ ៸ NEW POST 🤩 ﹙🎁﹚ 😻BOOST | #hsr #gluing cr png : @arcane_png @HSRpng @pngdecorative 🤩 #яогуан 🤍 #эванесса

🍓10custom 53505034365320734099custom 54631488365894313769custom 52357492934317515283custom 52359047626579294301

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jojolya1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 714,909 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“﹫ 𝗝𝗢lya переезд” (@jojolya1), 82 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jojolya1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.