Channel
@joinneda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
259subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001106962322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @joinneda |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 May 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/joinneda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 259 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 260 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 261 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:59 | 261 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تمساحها بعد از خوردن شکار، به دلیل هوای محبوس شده در سینوسهایشان اشک میریزند، نه از روی پشیمانی؛ به همین دلیل اصطلاح «اشک تمساح» برای کسی به کار میرود که فقط تظاهر به ناراحتی میکند. 🌎@joinneda
👍1😁1
Signed Neda
🟠 گاهی یک متن، بیش از آنکه پاسخی به یک پرسش باشد، چراغی برای ادامه راه است. اگر چند دقیقه فرصت دارید، این روایت را تا پایان بخوانید؛ شاید شما هم معنای تازهای از زندگی پیدا کنید. — سیروان کنعانی✌️❤️🍃 🔹 فیلسوف یونانی، دکتر پاپادروس، در پایان یکی از کلاسهایش پرسید: «آیا کسی سؤالی دارد؟» در میان دانشجویان، رابرت فولگام، نویسنده مشهور، پرسید: «جناب دکتر پاپادروس، معنای زندگی چیست؟» بعضی از دانشجویان خندیدند؛ اما…
❤1
Signed Neda
از مِهر دوستان ریاکار خوشتر است، دشنام دشمنی که چو آیینه راستگوست! پروین اعتصامی 🌎@joinneda
❤1
Signed Neda
هرگز از هیچکس نپرسید چهچیزی درست است و چهچیزی غلط است.. زندگی یک تجربه است که باید کشف شود. هر شخصی باید آگاه , گوش بزنگ , و مراقب باشد , و با زندگی آزمایش کند و کشف کند چهچیزی برای او خوب است...... هر آنچه که به انسان صلح دهد , هر آنچه که انسان را سعادتمند سازد , هر آنچه که به انسان صفا دهد , هر آنچه که انسان را به هستی و هارمونی عظیم او نزدیکتر سازد خوب است. و هر آنچه که تنش , شوربختی , رنج را در انسان بیا…
👍1
Signed Neda
این یکی از زیباترین آموزههای گنوستیک هست در متنی به نام انجیل توما آمده است: اگر آنچه در درون توست آشکار شود، نجاتت خواهد داد .. و اگر آنچه در درون توست آشکار نشود، همان تو را نابود خواهد کرد ..
Signed Neda
قبل از اینکه بخش غلط حرف او را نقد کنید، بخش کوچکی از حرفش که درست است را تایید کنید. چرا؟ چون با این کار به مغز او سیگنال میدهید که «من دشمن تو نیستم». وقتی مغز از حالت دفاعی خارج شد، دریچهی پذیرش حقیقت باز میشود. تغییر باورهای عمیق، یک فرآیند است، نه یک اتفاق. انتظار نداشته باشید کسی در وسط سفره شام ناگهان بگوید:«حق با توست، من اشتباه میکردم!» حقیقت معمولاً ساعتها یا روزها بعد، وقتی فرد در تنهایی خودش به حر…
Signed Neda
تغییر دادن فکر یک آدم بالغ، آن هم در یک بحث داغ خانوادگی، تقریباً محال است. تغییر باورهای عمیق، یک فرآیند است، نه یک اتفاق. انتظار نداشته باشید کسی در وسط سفره شام ناگهان بگوید:«حق با توست، من اشتباه میکردم!» حفظ رابطه، حتی با وجود عدم توافق، ارزشمندتر از پیروزی در بحث است. در بسیاری از خانوادههای ایرانی، سیاست دیگر صرفاً یک بحث نظری درباره نحوه اداره کشور نیست، بلکه به هویت فردی و اخلاقی گره خورده است. وقتی کسی ن…
👏1
Signed Neda
همهٔ ما گناهکاران گزینشی هستیم. گناهانی را انتخاب میکنیم که با آنها راحتیم و برای گناهانی که با آنها راحت نیستیم، دیگران را قضاوت میکنیم. تو دروغ میگویی، اما خیانتکار را قضاوت میکنی. تو خیانت میکنی، اما دزد را قضاوت میکنی. تو دزدی میکنی، اما معتاد را قضاوت میکنی. هرکس خط خودش را میکشد و وانمود میکند که در سمت درست آن ایستاده است. همهٔ ما چیزهایی داریم که برای خودمان بیصدا اجازه میدهیم انجام دهیم، عادت…
❤3
Signed Neda
🌎@joinneda
Signed Neda
دنیا به دست اوباش است و نیکان به گناه لیاقت میمیرند .. 🌎@joinneda
👏1😢1
Signed Neda
وقتی بی درایتی بر سرزمین سایه می افکند، موج های خفتهٔ خرد و عشق درون مردم بالا می آید 🌎@joinneda
👏1🤔1
Signed Neda
رنج واقعی اغلب در خود اتفاقات نیست رنج واقعی اغلب در مقاومت ذهنی ما در برابر آن اتفاقات است به دلیل آنکه ذهن ما در حالت تسلیم و پذیرش نیست و به همین دلیل از مسائل و اتفاقات رنج تولید می کند 🌎@joinneda
❤1
Signed Neda
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @joinneda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 787,310 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@joinneda named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ازحال بد به حال خوب” (@joinneda), 259 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/joinneda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.