Channel
@johncesthatecf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003576299557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @johncesthatecf |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/johncesthatecf |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 62 | +12 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 50 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 42 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 40 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 38 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 35 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 35 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
85 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 37.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 31 | 36.5% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 7.06% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.53% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.53% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня очень бесит что существует во первых этот шип, во вторых в нём присутствуют только 3 версии Джона втф чувак😭😭✌, почему вы узники Грейса Зена и репрайва... Поиск интеллекта фанатов джонц*ста :: 🔍🔍🔍🔍 Итог :: не обнаружено ❌❌❌❌ ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
🔥3
Джонцесты умруттт Заебали джонцесты, пишешь одно, выдает их Джонцесты идите нахуй. #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤🔥3💘2
я не буду ето скачивать чювак мне вообще не попадаются тт по Грейсу, почему тут всплывает вот такая вот специфика прям ето жесть если создатель этого тт сидит в этом кф лан чювак у тебя стиль очень прикольный НО ГРЕЙСПРИВЫ -РЕП неа н Мизантропия щащащаща ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
😭2
#ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
😇1
У меня любимый художник рисует грейспр*йвов и джонц*стов вообще. - реп за это 🤬🤬... #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤3👀2
ДА УЙДИТЕ ОТСЮДА НАХУЙ пожалейте меня мне пришлось это фоткать чтобы показать фу бля ща удалю ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤1❤🔥1
https://t.me/johncesthatecf/72 мы будем до конца обсасывать эту тему потому что я так сказал. меня крайне заебало то,что кнопка "неинтересно" тупо не работает. что в пинте,что в тик токе... мне вечно приходится дрочить эту кнопку на каждом ебучем посте,чтобы результата НЕ БЫЛО. меня это капец как бесит,когда я ищу СОЛО арты мне выдает это говно😡❌ ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤🔥2❤1
Щукаа меня бесит то что когад я искал картинку стобы показать челу как выглядить джон грейс мне попадаются ебанные грейсрепривы бля #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство 💔💔💔😭😭😭😭 ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤🔥3❤1
🐱: ДРУЖНОЕ НАПОМИНАНИЕ О ТОМ,что пожелания смерти ШУТОЧНЫ. никого лично мы не идём травить за то,что ему нравится. если вас задевают такие шутки или вообще факт существования нашей конфы - уходите. никто не держит вас сидеть здесь и читать всё это. хейт конфа на то и хейт конфа,но мы не настолько животные, так что делать из нас аморальных чудищ НЕ НАДО
❤8❤🔥2
УБЕРИТЕ ЭТО ДЕРЬМО ПЖЖ скажи джонц*сту — нет ! Будь свободным человеком! Оопььь #ДжонЦестЭтоУбийство Неанон белу ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤🔥3🤔3❤2
Меня бесит что в моем любимом кф по Джону кидают джонц*стов!!!! Я когда вижу хотя бы два тега в описании видео даже не смотрю его.............. Неанон белужно подсосня 69 ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤3❤🔥1
как же меня задолбало то,что когда я ищу в пинте арты с ОДНИМ джоном,там вылазит это говно шипперское. идите нахуй ✗ #тейк 𓄧 @johncesthatetakesbot ❌
❤🔥4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @johncesthatecf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДЖОНЦЕСТ ХЕЙТ КФ /НЕГ ❌❌❌❌❌” (@johncesthatecf), 62 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/johncesthatecf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.