3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 596–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:58
596
-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:15
599
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:31
599
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 596 subscribers
Avg views / post
202
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
16 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,017
Reactions total
188
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 09s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
254 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
62
24.4%
❤
58
22.8%
🔥
42
16.5%
😍
23
9.06%
custom 5321496331221485872
14
5.51%
custom 5208654432115376270
13
5.12%
custom 5208702673188047113
7
2.76%
🏆
7
2.76%
👏
6
2.36%
🆒
5
1.97%
🦄
5
1.97%
👍
4
1.57%
custom 5208965331913034325
3
1.18%
custom 5206245642657089808
2
0.787%
🤗
2
0.787%
💯
1
0.394%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.25%
1 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
192
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
220
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquqtXF8
1
1 August 2026
1 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💔 Обещала вернуться с рефрешем — и вернулась.
(Смотрите 3 и 4 фото)
«Добрый день🔆
Возвращаюсь с отчётом о рефреше
Вся магия ✨ в воде и паре пшиков спрея PROTEiCAO.TERM
В основе укладки:
— кондиционер от Urban care
— в качестве ливина новинка а-море
— пре-стайлинг новинка и-рис (на мокрые, отжатые волосы)
— спрей в качестве стайлинга PROTEiCAO.TERM
Хочу обратить особое внимание на то, что данная укладка выполнена с е…
Красивое умиротворяющее видео от @kateiordan 🥰
«На Екатерине шикарные кудри с укладкой от J&J AneiRo lab и великолепный платок из шелка Армани (подарок от любимых производителей косметики ❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥)»
А если вы тоже хотите фирменный шёлковый платок J&J ANEIRO, то сейчас его можно получить в подарок к заказу 🎁
Подробнее об акции здесь
💔 Curlfest 2026 прошел, но мы не готовы так быстро расставаться с этой атмосферой. Поэтому до 8 августа оформить заказ можно по ценам фестиваля.
🎁 И это ещё не всё. К заказу — подарки:
🟠 И-РИС — интеллектуальная рисовая плекс-вода.
🟠 А-МОРЕ — аквабиотическая сыворотка для кожи головы и волос.
☝🏻 Те самые новинки, которые на фестивале разыгрывались в лотерею и достались только счастливчикам с выигрышными билетами.
…
Волосы тоже хотят восстановление по всем законам, не просто красивый визуал! Поэтому показываю крутое средство, которое оочень мне помогло с состоянием волос. И заодно открыть бренд, который заслуживает бОльшей популярности!
J&J Aneiro, крем-кондиционер для сухих и поврежденных волос
(копируется при нажатии)
Про состав, потому что он того реально стоит!! (кликаем сюда)
Аж 6% BADD - теоретически восстанавливает дису…
💔 Когда обзор делает косметолог — читать особенно приятно
Обычно мы сами рассказываем, как устроены наши формулы. А тут за нас это сделал человек, который профессионально разбирает составы: блогер и косметолог с канала «Косметику - на стол» https://t.me/kosmetos_na_stol
Влада взяла наш крем-кондиционер для сухих и повреждённых волос TOTAL.REPAIR в личное использование при тяжёлом состоянии волос — с ломкостью и сеч…
🏆💔 CURLY AWARDS 2026: спасибо, что выбрали нас
Пока мы готовились к CURLFEST, независимая премия кудрявого сообщества подвела итоги. Что у нас в дипломах вы можете увидеть в рилсе ⬆️
☝🏻 Здесь важно понимать, как устроена эта премия. Curly Awards — это голоса самих кудрявых: тех, кто покупает за свои деньги, пользуется каждый день и делает выводы по реальному состоянию волос. Здесь нельзя выиграть красивой упаковкой…
💔 У нашей косметики есть один побочный эффект.
На упаковке о нём не пишут. Но мастера подтвердят 😅
После неё другие средства в руки брать невыносимо.
Свежая история — эмоции оставляем как есть. У одной нашей клиентки сорвался отпуск и она поехала по родным: Карелия, Питер, кудрявые племянницы. Решила заодно поучить девочек уходу. Начала работать на том, что нашлось дома.
И выдала почти дословно:
💬«Волосы сухие, …
Делимся с вами шикарным видео и отзывом от мастера Инны Рокаль ⬇️
«Этот кейс — о том, что нет ничего невозможного, если мастер знает матчасть и не боится сложностей.
Дарье в другом салоне отказали в частичной коррекции, предложив только полную перезавивку. Но зачем мучить длину, если её можно сохранить? Мы пошли другим путем.
Что сделали?
✔️Использовали реконструкцию @jnjlab — она буквально «накормила» волос ресу…
💬💔 «Боялась, что распушит или вообще отвалится» (с)
Ольга Борисова — колорист и парикмахер с большим стажем, которая отлично разбирается в составах. Год назад она познакомилась с нашей косметикой на обучении у Инны Рокаль, целый год наблюдала за результатами в чужих работах и наконец решилась взять средства себе на пробу.
И сразу кейс, где ошибиться нельзя. 🔥
Что было с волосами:
Две биозавивки, обесцвеченные пря…
Благодарим певицу Илиану Санчез за прекрасное видео 💔
И напоминаем, что ⬇️
26 июля на фестивале CURLFEST можно будет приобрести фирменные платки J&J Aneiro. Красочные, но в то же время элегантные. Любой образ сделают не просто нишевым, а эксклюзивным.
А еще они из натурального шёлка Armani 🔥
«Девочки, делюсь личным и очень важным!
За мои 24 года в профессии я видела сотни брендов, но сегодня мое сердце (и профессиональный интерес) отданы
J&J AneiRo. Мне посчастливилось стать творческим партнером этого бренда, и для меня это про ценности и качество.
Мне прислали на тест их новые продукты, и я скажу честно: для работы с поврежденными волосами - это лучшее, что мне встречалось за всю мою практику. Я уже п…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jnjlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 595,420 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“J&J ANEIRO | профессиональная косметика для волос | уход | стайлинг” (@jnjlab), 596 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jnjlab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
