来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢推特onlyfans精品... 📢欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 ... 📢国漫伍六一 📢欧博官网|亚星官网|欧博... 📢体育竞技-电子游戏-开云... 📢亚星假网|欧博假网|亚星... 📢缅甸正规赌场线上赌博平台 📢欧博代理 欧博官网 欧博... 📢缅甸赌场-欧亚国际 -线... 📢史图馆|历史|博物馆 📢亚星代理 亚星正网 亚星... 📢银幕故事 📢韩国顶级车模|车展直拍|... 📢外围足球 世界杯足球 世... 📢🇹🇼台灣困困賴667... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢💹567U时代火爆上线!招收玩家/代理,匿名开户,放心娱乐! 📢 飞驰号铺 [主营:飞机号 开会员 代充星星] 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|吃瓜缅甸妙瓦底大揭 📢 Ton 中文索引 🥇2G.COM 品牌定位全球 实力超乎想象 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpB…

Channel
吉隆坡外围兼职 吉隆坡扶手 吉隆坡莞式一条龙
@jlpyj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+101 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003912280273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jlpyj |
| Created | 12 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jlpyj |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 109 | +101 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 8 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.83%
- avg views ÷ 109 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (12 September 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @jlpyj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cn123 · 8,8011 post国漫伍六一
@H6910563 · 151 post缅甸正规赌场线上赌博平台
@hh663399 · 91 post亚星代理 亚星正网 亚星官网 亚星私网
@jgngkgmkfnfn · 801 post缅甸赌场-欧亚国际 -线上网投开户-百家乐包赢技术
@Kquziz · 91 post外围足球 世界杯足球 世界杯下注 世界杯投注
@oubo1103 · 1931 post亚星假网|欧博假网|亚星杀猪|欧博杀猪|亚星私网|欧博私网
@oubosp · 51 post欧博官网|亚星官网|欧博百家乐|亚星百家乐
@oubovvk · 41 post速搜
@ssou · 215,6741 post速搜❤️🔥流量互推/广告交易
@TonAdNews · 11,0551 post体育竞技-电子游戏-开云棋牌--百家乐-博彩新闻
@Vik667 · 91 post🇹🇼台灣困困賴667v平價外送茶🍵專區 💰 3K-5K上門服務叫小姐
@yao19968 · 4011 post欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 线上百家乐 利博百家乐
@yaxing11w · 51 post东南亚大事件
@yuenanU · 219,8521 post欧博代理 欧博官网 欧博正网 欧博百家乐
@zh_cnjjdudh · 331 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吉隆坡外围兼职 吉隆坡扶手 吉隆坡莞式一条龙” (@jlpyj), 109 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jlpyj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.