Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JL_IN_JULY

Channel

JL_IN_JULY

@jl_in_july

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

351subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746850477
TypeChannel
Username@jl_in_july
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jl_in_july

Growth

351354352.57 August 2026 — 353 subscribers8 August 2026 — 353 subscribers14 August 2026 — 354 subscribers22 August 2026 — 353 subscribers28 August 2026 — 354 subscribers5 September 2026 — 351 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 351–354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 00:59351-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:18354+1
22 Aug 2026, 03:47353-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:33354+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:46353no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:10353first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52672028121141291722013.8%
🏆1913.1%
custom 52539099398726184331711.7%
custom 52671494385555425991711.7%
🐳149.66%
🔥138.97%
custom 5253617641578318802106.90%
custom 526706833668808939285.52%
👀85.52%
🕊85.52%
custom 525372308732040266953.45%
🎉53.45%
custom 526472672051831343810.69%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jl_in_july. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC95 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥 игра на 1 стрим, которую я хотела пройти еще 5 лет назад вот видите, я рано или поздно прохожу все, что хочу 🙂 What remains of Edith Finch - игрофильм на пару часов

🐳4🔥2custom 52672028121141291721

6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC141 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

теперь еще одна игра и вроде тоже небольшая - Anomaly Exit синкансен я прошла за минут 25 😒 потому что уже натренирована в других играх

6 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC144 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥 проходим shinkansen 0 - игра на поиск аномалий в японском поезде (суть аналогична игре the exit 8 и тд) дбд без варпа не работает, с с варпом сегодня стрим не дружит, но ивент успели посмотреть

6 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC141 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥 новый ивент в дбд смотрим: в темноте без перков тоже не видела еще такой ивент ну а потом опять брошу игру на неопределенный срок 🙂

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC144 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вчера в конце стрима был внезапный экспресс-обзор игр в моем стиме (кому интересно, посмотрите) а сейчас сделала список "надо пройти" + сюда макс пейн + перепройти ситис скайлайнс + думаю стрей перепройти мб? + а, еще из списка желаемого будут постепенно игры появляться надо пройти ≠ пройду 😌

🔥5👀3

6 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC153 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

наконец рассказ о грядках ура Надеюсь, вы помните, что мы год назад переехали в замкадье в свой дом и сами делаем там ремонт? История в этом посте. Короче, два городских человека без дач в детстве решили начать эксперименты над растениями. В прошлом году сделали три временные грядки, что-то даже выросло. В этом году в тех же временных грядках решила изучить новые растения. Никогда не видела, как растет капуста. Пос

custom 525390993987261843317custom 52536176415783188028custom 52670683366880893925

5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC155 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥закончим сегодня? viewfinder

🐳1custom 52672028121141291721

5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC166 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

в ближайшие недели планы на прохождение разных небольших игр, в основном чилловых поэтому потестим дропсы автора (недавно сделали на твиче такое) - за просмотр 10ч стримов один вид значка, - за 5 сабок другой вид значка они будут доступны в течение месяца, но останутся с вами навсегда но в любой момент стримы могут исчезнуть/уйти на паузу по внезапным причинам

custom 52672028121141291729custom 52670683366880893923custom 52536176415783188022

3 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC179 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥 узнала, что в дбд ивент с рандомными перками, надо попробовать тем более, что 2/3 перков мне вообще не знакомы

🐳1

1 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC235 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥 продолжаем расслабляться в красивом мире.... (игра суперкайф!) а про июльские стримы - я просто оцениваю вероятность стримов в следующем июле как очень низкую, а как по факту будет, посмотрим

custom 52672028121141291726🎉2

31 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC249 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟥последний июльский стрим (вероятно, и в истории канала в целом? 😔 ) давайте заходите чиллить под очень красивую лайтовую игру Viewfinder

custom 526714943855554259917👀5custom 52537230873204026695

30 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC259 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Homesick советую пройти тем, кто любит атмосферные штуки у меня заняло 4 часа ровно + красивая, понравились почти все головоломки, короткая, не душит - передачу лора хотелось поразнообразнее, заунывная скрипка, настройки багованные + их мало, местами недоработки 6/10

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jl_in_july. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Apex Legends News
@kh_apex · 30,461
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JL_IN_JULY” (@jl_in_july), 351 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jl_in_july.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.