16 Nov 2025, 13:28 UTC835 viewsread 8 August 2026
Девочки, я знаю вас взламывали так. Как вы вернули себе свой айфон? У одной моей знакомой случилась такое чп.
Channel
#беверли 𐤀
@jkxxuli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
410subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001161999626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jkxxuli |
| Description | если я расскажу о тьме внутри меня, ты будешь продолжать смотреть на меня, как на солнце? _________ @miralya_bot |
| Created | 3 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jkxxuli |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 410 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 410 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,320
- Videos
- ≈294
- Links
- ≈290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5289747975919129668 | 20 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2025 to 16 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
29 Sept 2025, 18:55 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Тут не только про кр, про все. Типа моды раздает, тварь блядь. Есть же наивные, боже мне жаль таких людей.
29 Sept 2025, 18:54 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 8 August 2026
Было подозрительно, что мод ТОЛЬКО НА АЙФОНЫ. я сразу заподозрила, что речь о мошенничестве
29 Sept 2025, 18:53 UTC983 viewsread 8 August 2026
Видео в тт было, что раздают бесплатный мод для КР, просят только юз в тг. Да я по приколу закинула, знала что тут не чисто что-то. Так ситуация пошла по сценарию, по которому я и ожидала.
29 Sept 2025, 18:49 UTC952 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Итог: чс. Умоляю, берегите себя и свои айфоны. Я надеюсь вы не попадались, родные?
17 Jun 2025, 12:10 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 8 August 2026
Боже, милые. У меня есть деньги, но никто не понял, что Грузия буквально против СНГ стран и тут невозможен перевод денежных средств в те страны. Вот в чем проблема.
17 Jun 2025, 12:02 UTC≈1,800 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Всем привет. К сожалению, как бы я не хотела вернуть этот канал - крайне невозможно. Я нахожусь в другой стране, и чтобы восстановить канал - Нужна реклама, а купить можно только у снг стран, а переехала я в Грузию… Мне очень жаль, даже если бы мне и хотелось.
custom 528974797591912966820
25 Mar 2025, 15:03 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 8 August 2026
Объясняю для тех, кто не понял что делать, ибо таких в анон полно: вам достаточно перейти по ссылке и отправить петицию. Там так же будет момент с пожертвованием, это по желанию, самое главное оставить петицию в помощь для этих девушек. Объясняю ситуацию: эти женщины из Афганистана, активистки за права женщин и прочее, они находятся сейчас в Пакистане, но по причине того, что у них скоро закончится виза - их могут д…
25 Mar 2025, 08:07 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Распространите по мере возможности.
25 Mar 2025, 08:07 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
https://www.change.org/p/save-35-afghan-women-leaders-from-imminent-deportation?redirect_reason=guest_user Каждый голос важен 🙏🏿
16 Feb 2025, 19:51 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 8 August 2026
Продать - смешно. Не тянет канал. И не продала бы ни за какие гроши. Отдать - тем более. В этом канале воспоминаний куча, а я человек привязанный к воспоминаниям и не особо хочется избавляться от них. Поэтому в мыслях такого пока что нет 🤍
16 Feb 2025, 19:50 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 8 August 2026
не желаете отдать кому-то канал или продать?
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @jkxxuli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,032,673 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#беверли 𐤀” (@jkxxuli), 410 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jkxxuli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.