Channel
@jkgfftujbvdfv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
267subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001544860300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jkgfftujbvdfv |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jkgfftujbvdfv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 267 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 268 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 268 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 269 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
◈💠 اخترنا لك ارقى 💠◈ ◈💠 وافضل قنوات التليجرام 💠◈ ◈💠 الليستة تعمل بشكل آلي بالكامل 💠◈ ◈💠 بأقواى التقنيات الحديثة لضمان الزياده 💠◈ ◈💠 للعشاق ؟ 💠◈ ◈ خبئني بك دع كُل من ينظر لقلبك يراني فيبتعد ◈ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎ 💠 للإنضمام الى ليستة شغف @KINGG340 💠
Signed لستةة شغف لدعٓمِٛ ٱلقنِوٱإتِ 1k
◈💠 اخترنا لك ارقى 💠◈ ◈💠 وافضل قنوات التليجرام 💠◈ ◈💠 الليستة تعمل بشكل آلي بالكامل 💠◈ ◈💠 بأقواى التقنيات الحديثة لضمان الزياده 💠◈ ◈💠 للعشاق ؟ 💠◈ ◈ خبئني بك دع كُل من ينظر لقلبك يراني فيبتعد ◈ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎ 💠 للإنضمام الى ليستة شغف @KINGG340 💠
Signed لستةة شغف لدعٓمِٛ ٱلقنِوٱإتِ 1k
شباب بنات انضمو ريحو علا انفسكم شوي👆👆👆
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
الي حاب المتعه واتسليه هنا👆👆👆
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
https://t.me/fghjkcxzdv
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
وَ تِلك العيونُ قَصائدٌ لو تُرجمت لم يبـْقَ عند القائلينَ كـلام . ♥️🫂
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
آعود منتصرا في كل معاركي مالي أمام عينيها اهزم . ♥️🫂
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
إنّ العيون الذي في طرفها حورٌ قتلتنا ثم لم تحيي قتلانا . ♥️🫂
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
من أين أبدا ومن أين انتهي فـ جميع معالمك اتنفسها عشقاً . 🎀
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
° وأي جمال بعدَ عيناكَ يذكــر . ♥️🫂
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
الشيء المؤكَّد دائمًا أنني أحبك . 🎀
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
وإن تمنيتّ شيء فأنت كُل التمني . 🧡
Signed سعليك هوانا ٱ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jkgfftujbvdfv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 149,523 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jkgfftujbvdfv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عاشق مجنون” (@jkgfftujbvdfv), 267 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jkgfftujbvdfv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.