я тут думаю о том, чтобы вернуться 🌟
🍓13🎉7❤6

Channel
@jjmyluv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
266subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001874547221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jjmyluv |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jjmyluv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 266 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 266 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
779 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 154 | 19.8% | |
| custom 5231272198047554274 | 151 | 19.4% | |
| 💔 | 151 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5240277219753868849 | 106 | 13.6% | |
| 💘 | 103 | 13.2% | |
| 🍓 | 34 | 4.36% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 3.47% | |
| 💋 | 22 | 2.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 1.16% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.03% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.899% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.77% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.128% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 779reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я тут думаю о том, чтобы вернуться 🌟
🍓13🎉7❤6
чо как жизнь ребят ?
🍓11❤3
если захотите связаться со мной @satolou @fosterloubot канала другого у меня только мой личный ❤️
❤10💘4
❤️ всем привета 😊 я очень долго решалась на это. не буду тянуть и скажу сразу я ухожу , канал не буду удалять , так как он очень ценен для меня , здесь вся я и вся любовь которую я посвятила джастину. создавая этот канал я никогда бы не смогла подумать, что соберу такое количество аудитории 500 людей , что были подписаны на мой канал с которыми я делилась искренней любовью к джэджэ ещё задолго до смтр. и вот его деб…
💔36❤6💘3
канал не активен из-за моей депрессии, апатии и всему подобного , пожалуйста не отписывайтесь ❤ , как только я уволюсь с работы я такую суету наведу здесь
💔48❤8
Video, posted without a caption
❤31💔21💘3
▫️ см анонсировали даты нового смтаун в фукуоке с 31 января по 3 февраля, получается, мы получим выступление смтр уже с дебютной песней ? ? дай бог нам вообще дадут дату дебюта 😭 ▫️
custom 524027721975386884927💘8❤6💋1
🌟 23О7 ‘ smtr25 tiktok
custom 524027721975386884929❤18🔥10💘6❤🔥3🍓1💋1
ТИКТОК СМТР ААААА
🔥17❤6💘3custom 52402772197538688493💋1
НЕ РУГАЙТЕ МЕНЯ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА , я скоро удалю , эоны просто поплачьте !!
custom 523127219804755427429💔20❤13❤🔥3💘3💋1
«лучший друг — это тот, кто смеётся над тобой громче всех» и мы все знаем кто лучший друг джастина, а также именно харута был первым был кто пошел за джастином когда он вышел 😭 их дружба буквально « я могу подшутить над тобой изо всех сил, но буду первым, кто утешит тебя, когда тебе грустно »
💘23custom 523127219804755427413🍓8💋4❤🔥3
what’s in my bag джастин ( 🐻 ) ‘ justin : следующее с чем я люблю играть, можно ли назвать это игрушкой? или это моё….нет это не хобби. я профессионал ‘ hamin : ты профессионал ? ( 🐻 ) ‘ justin : да я могу сказать , что я профи в этом , я уверен , поэтому я постоянно продолжаю тренироваться, чтобы добиться большего , я усердно тренируюсь!! это ручной скейтборд. сколько я за него заплатил? он довольно дорогой. 20 т…
custom 523127219804755427426custom 524027721975386884913💘11❤2💋2🍓1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jjmyluv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 896,375 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jjmyluv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔒jj - japanese prince ✧” (@jjmyluv), 266 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jjmyluv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.