Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for '𝐉𝐉K̷ 𝑯AT̷ES

Channel

'𝐉𝐉K̷ 𝑯AT̷ES

@jjkhate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004466989237
TypeChannel
Username@jjkhate
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jjkhate

Growth

9910099.516 September 2026 — 99 subscribers16 September 2026 — 99 subscribers18 September 2026 — 100 subscribers16 September 202618 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:38100+1
16 Sept 2026, 09:2299no change
16 Sept 2026, 08:4799first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
195.7%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 August 202615 September 2026)
Views total3,914
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC26 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @Mityadaily_cfPhoto

🎀🧬🧬🧬🤩 🔡𝓪i𝑖 is this. . . 🤩 🌟⏝ ︶ прекр𝓪сный 🔤итя? 🤩 🌟🤩хочешь больше контента🍼 🌟:🌀🌀🌀🌀🌀🌀: с ним? 🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀🤩 🤩 🌟🌟https://t.me/Mityadaily_cf

15 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC26 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @bebebbouPhoto

{🫥} welcome to. . . 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 канал , в котором ты можешь разместить свою рекламу / услуги рекламы 🖤 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 mp , reklama , поиск админов @adsellconf_bot own: nnasbekk {🪷}

15 Sept 2026, 05:40 UTC30 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @L_Bee_corpPhoto

🗣️🗣️◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢🤍🤍 🤩🤩🤍🤩🤍🤩🤩🤩🤍🤩🤩🤩 🤍🤍🤍⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ 🤍🤍 Фобам с пчелофобам фоба! Любите сетки и игру Корпорация Лоботомия? Простой сюжет и куча эмоций? Ненавидете Королёву пчёл или наоборот её обожаете? 🖇 LOBOTOMY CORPORATION BEEKEEPING 🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️🤩⭐️⭐️🤩 🤩Мы – сеть каналов с оригинальными и фанатскими персонажами по мотивам игры🖇LOBOTOMY CORPORATION с обычным, но с поэтапным развитием сюжета. Нашими маск

15 Sept 2026, 05:20 UTC29 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @QueenofhatredDailyXCfPhoto

"In the name of Love and Justice~ Here comes Magical Girl!" ─────ೋღ 🌺 ღೋ───── 𝚆𝙴𝙻𝙲𝙾𝙼𝙴 𝚃𝙾 𝚀𝚄𝙴𝙴𝙽 𝙾𝙵 𝙷𝙰𝚃𝚁𝙴𝙳 𝙳𝙰𝙸𝙻𝚈 𝚇 𝙲𝙵! ──────୨ৎ─────── Здесь вы найдете ежедневный контент с ПМ персонажем под именем Королева ненависти! «────── « ⋅ʚ♡ɞ⋅ » ──────» Навигация:: Вп @Queenofhatreddailytakebot Буст •┈┈┈••✦ ♡ ✦••┈┈┈• Админ состав:: [👀]Этернал(она/её)|| Владелец, посты/вп/тейки [💛//💤]Ами|| посты/вп .•*•.•*•.•*•.•*•.•*•.•*•. D

15 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC38 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @LobotomyCorporationconfesionsPhoto

🤩🤩🤩❌❌❌❌❌🤩🤩🤩 🤩🖇 ➖лерки носятся в ❌🤩 панике, аномалии разгуливают по комплексу.. Чë тут бл🖇ть происходит?! 🖇 😻Без паники, управляющий.... Мы приветствуем вас в... ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖🖇 🖇❌ ❤️/💤 Митбой, Она/её - владелец отвечает за тейки и вп ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🖇❌🥸 Валасака - админ отвечает за тейки 🖇❌🐦 ваня хасси, он/они отвечает за тейки 🖇❌✝️Фёдор, он/его, отвечает за вп 🖇❌💙 Матрас, мест любые отвечает за вп

10 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC91 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Вот эту хуйню anon ⥂ non anon :: @jjkhate_bot #take ⋮ @jjkhate < согласны?

9 Sept 2026, 10:27 UTC106 viewsread 16 September 2026

ебучие сексуализированные арты с маки в обтягивающем платье anon ⥂ non anon :: @jjkhate_bot #take ⋮ @jjkhate < согласны?

7 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC124 viewsread 16 September 2026

геге акутами anon ⥂ non anon :: @jjkhate_bot #take ⋮ @jjkhate < согласны?

4 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC167 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

подобные арты с чосо, это какой то пиздец anon ⥂ non anon :: @jjkhate_bot #take ⋮ @jjkhate < согласны?

3 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC191 viewsread 16 September 2026

🎁 𝕬𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 . .🥩 🤩🤩 › твистифай🥹øwñ 🤩🍣 › мина-чан🥹m̷p 🤩🍰 › диса🥹mp̷ стāть админøм :: @jkxadm_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jjkhate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“'𝐉𝐉K̷ 𝑯AT̷ES” (@jjkhate), 100 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jjkhate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.