Channel

津 . 冀精品资源新模式

@jjjpzy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001813056304
Type	Channel
Username	@jjjpzy
Created	18 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	12 August 2026
Last confirmed live	23 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/jjjpzy

Growth

3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–10 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
23 Aug 2026, 02:52	9	-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:31	10	no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:31	10	first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 18 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 583,302 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

安徽品茶资源
@anhuiziyuan · 741 post 北京品茶资源
@beijingwaiweiziyuan · 261 post 长沙品茶资源
@changshaziyuan2 · 931 post 成都约炮资源
@chengduziyuan2 · 651 post 杭州宁波约炮资源群
@fafg1231 · 731 post 佛山品茶资源
@foshanziyuan2 · 391 post 成都市品茶资源群
@ggjk321 · 231 post 广州约炮资源 ❤️
@gzypzy · 1581 post 惠州市品🍵资源
@hbbjjj12 · 621 post 河南品茶资源
@henanziyuan · 471 post 河源品茶资源
@heyuanziyuan2 · 341 post 海口市品茶资源楼凤约炮线下外围
@hjnjg321 · 321 post 湖北品茶资源
@hubeiziyuan · 401 post 杭州约炮 🍵 浙江🍵 台州🍵宁波🍵 瑞安🍵义乌🍵嘉善🍵湖州🍵约炮信息
@hzypzyxx · 1381 post 梅州市中山市品🍵资源外围约炮楼凤线下
@jjbbh89 · 761 post 南京品茶 ✈️资源
@nanjingziyuan1 · 231 post 三亚品茶资源
@sanyaziyuan2 · 281 post 武汉市品🍵资源
@sdgdsgda · 421 post 山东品茶资源
@shandongziyuan2 · 1431 post 山西品茶资源
@shanxiziyuan · 721 post 四川品茶资源
@sichuanyuepao · 431 post 深圳中山线下约炮资源
@szxxzy · 671 post 天津 ✈️资源
@tianjingziyuan · 601 post 珠海约炮资源
@zhuhaiziyuan2 · 591 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

天津精品资源新模式
@tjjpzy · 371 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 2; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 2; vacant every time we have ever looked

@jjjpzy named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@hbsqtdq
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026

@sjzlfjpzy
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“津 . 冀精品资源新模式” (@jjjpzy), 9 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jjjpzy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

津 . 冀 精品资源 新模式