🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔤🔤 - https://t.me/utrobajiticksa 🔤🔤🔤🔤 - https://t.me/alohachatgxc 🔤🔤 - soon 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 - soon 🔤🔤🔤🔤 - http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=9SLk21Qz32tVJah 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 - Можете прописать команду /donate у нас в чате🥵 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 - 🩸🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸❤️🩸🅰️🩸❓

Channel
жīтикç tg-gifts
@jitickstg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002412868833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jitickstg |
| Description | ls - @fyeroop фанат дурова |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 30 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jitickstg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 33
- Links
- 26
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 16.4% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 16.4% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 11.5% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 9.84% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 4.92% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5377466648510884634 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2025 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Мой новый телеграмм канал, Буду благодарен за внимание💋
В процессе, сегодня ночью хороший дроп.
🔥3🤔2
Думаю многие видели это сообщение, после того как кирияче сняли с администратора. Деанон был выполнен, я этого не отрицаю, но он был сделан лишь на одного администратора и по причине. Думаю все знают о том конфликте с германом. Если честно, с кораллом и кирияче, у меня были самые нормальные взаимоотношения, стараюсь связаться с ним, что бы узнать причину такого публичного убийства репутации. И да, *Получил больше…
❤🔥4❤2💋1😢1
Кто выйдет с канала - не любит маму. Дайте нам чуть времени, увидите совсем другой уровень🎰
👍4❤🔥2😡2🤓1
Чат менеджер, и предложка - не наш проект, администратор занимающийся ботами, был снят, в случае поступления каких либо сообщений от лица бота - не ведитесь, и отправьте мне
😢3🤬1
Video, posted without a caption
😢3🌚2😡2👌1🤷♂1
Долбаебы блять
😢3🤬1
Чат удален, нехуй было выебываться
🤔3
Хочу напомнить что у нас есть чатик - https://t.me/chatjitickssa Мы часто проводим в нем конкурсы и раздачи, общаемся на интересные темы, и отлично проводим в нем время, заходите😘
В телеграмм появилась рулетка НФТ, в которой вы можете выиграть пепе! Первый прокрут полностью бесплатный Бот
Избавился от всех звезд! А что дальше?😄 Планирую накопить 10 000 звезд, к выходу новых подарков. Я не потрачу ни звезды на платные чаты, на раскрытие картинок, и буду тупо копить звезды. Все почему то считают меня китом, но нет, я обычный парень, который скромно зарабатывает. Поэтому я начинаю копить. Буду писать отчеты в канал, единственное на что я буду тратить звезды - подарки близким(не рандомным), и улучшения …
🥰3❤🔥1💋1custom 53774666485108846341
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jitickstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@jitickstg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“жīтикç tg-gifts” (@jitickstg), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jitickstg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.