BTC突破65000美元,日内涨幅 0.17% 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,欧易OKX行情显示,BTC刚刚突破65000美元,现报65018.80美元/枚,日内涨幅 0.17%。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

Channel
金色财经 VIP版
@jinsevip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
565subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002670167306 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jinsevip |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jinsevip |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 565 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 565 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 564 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.805%
- avg views ÷ 565 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 91 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,190
- Links
- ≈845
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
一鲸鱼从Coinbase Prime提取3万枚ETH,并将资金分散至三个新钱包 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据 Onchain Lens 监测,一位巨鲸从 Coinbase Prime 账户中积累并提取了 3 万枚 ETH(约合 5721 万美元),并将资金分散存放在三个新创建的钱包中。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
美国加密监管法案再遭延期,CLARITY Act或拖至中期选举前博弈 8月8日消息,美国参议院已将加密货币监管法案《CLARITY Act》的投票推迟至五周暑期休会结束后,增加了国会在短期内无法完成加密市场监管立法的可能性。 《CLARITY Act》此前已在众议院获得两党支持,旨在为数字资产建立联邦监管框架,明确加密资产监管职责,并推动数字资产融入美国金融体系。 北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员Thom Tillis表示,法案因推迟至9月表决,其通过概率「可能下降了50%」。负责推动谈判的怀俄明州共和党参议员Cynthia Lummis则批评称,相关讨论已持续近11个月,法案内容增加约300页,并已满足民主党提出的大量修改要求,现在应进入投票阶段。 目前,民主党仍反对该法案,核心分歧集中在政府官员加密资产利益限制条款。民主党认为,现有版本未充分限制联邦官员投资和推广加密资产,也未要求相关人员完全退出持仓,同时希望赋予州检察长更强的执法…
某巨鲸止损700枚BTC后加仓30枚,目前仍浮亏60.5万美元 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据 Ai 姨监测,曾开出 1.02 亿美元 BTC 空单的地址昨晚九点止损 700 枚 BTC 并亏损 62.4 万美元,今日凌晨再次加仓 30 枚 BTC。目前该地址最新持仓为 930 枚 BTC(约 6032 万美元),入场均价 64,213 美元,清算价 65,306 美元,现仍浮亏 60.5 万美元。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
BIP-110或引发比特币分叉风险:开发者警告出售分叉币可能导致真实BTC被盗 8 月 8 日消息,比特币开发者 Kevin Loaec 警告称,若与争议提案 BIP-110 相关的比特币分叉在本周末发生,持有者出售分叉链代币时可能面临真实 BTC 被转走的风险。 报道称,若比特币出现两条链,用户持有的 BTC 余额可能会同时存在于两条链上。部分交易者可能会尝试出售看似「免费获得」的分叉币,但由于两条链初期缺乏重放保护(Replay Protection),出售分叉币时签署的交易可能被复制到原始比特币网络中,导致买家同时获得等量真实 BTC。 Kevin Loaec 表示,在不了解如何安全拆分两条链资产的情况下,持币者最安全的选择是暂时不要进行任何操作。未移动的 BTC 不会受到重放攻击影响,因为不存在可复制的签名交易。 此次风险源于 BIP-110 提案。该提案旨在限制比特币交易中包含图片、文本等非支付数据。由于未获得足够矿工…
一新钱包从Galaxy Digital收到1346枚比特币,价值8728万美元 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据 Lookonchain 监测,一个新创建的钱包(167YVr)从 Galaxy Digital 收到了 1,346 枚比特币(价值 8728 万美元)。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
英伟达拟向Lancium投资最高30亿美元,支持AI数据中心电力基础设施 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据财联社报道,英伟达已同意向电力基础设施开发商Lancium投资20亿美元,并承诺在该公司获得更多规划电力资源后追加投资10亿美元。据悉,此次交易对Lancium及其土地和电力连接资产的企业价值估值约为100亿美元,其中包括投资金额及债务。Lancium是由黑石集团支持的电力基础设施企业,负责开发位于美国得克萨斯州、服务于OpenAI和甲骨文AI园区的电力基础设施项目。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
曾开出1.02亿美元BTC空单地址昨晚止损700枚BTC,并加仓30枚BTC 金色财经报道,8月8日,据链上分析师@ai_9684xtpa监测,曾开出1.02亿美元BTC空单的地址昨晚九点止损700枚BTC并亏损62.4万美元,今天凌晨01:33加仓30枚BTC。 目前最新持仓为930枚BTC(约6032万美元),入场均价64213美元,清算价65,306美元,现仍浮亏60.5万美元。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
休眠三年的某巨鲸向Kraken充值7323枚ETH,若卖出将亏损近600万美元 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据 Ai 姨监测,休眠近三年的 ETH 巨鲸苏醒,其资产较建仓时已缩水 30%。地址 0x7C5…77b86 曾在 2022.02.15-03.21 期间以均价 2723.2 美元提出 23834.17 枚 ETH,价值 6490 万美元,随后质押进了 Rocket Pool。10 小时前该鲸鱼苏醒后向 Kraken 充值 7323 ETH(1396 万美元),若卖出将亏损 597.7 万美元。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
英伟达拟向Lancium投资至多30亿美元,支持AI数据中心电力基础设施 金色财经报道,8月8日,据The Information报道,英伟达(NVDA.O)已同意向电力基础设施开发商Lancium投资20亿美元,并承诺在该公司获得更多规划电力资源后追加投资10亿美元。据悉,此次交易对Lancium及其土地和电力连接资产的企业价值估值约为100亿美元,其中包括投资金额及债务。Lancium是由黑石集团支持的电力基础设施企业,负责开发位于美国得克萨斯州、服务于OpenAI和甲骨文AI园区的电力基础设施项目。(金十) 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
某沉睡3年ETH巨鲸10小时前向Kraken充值7323枚ETH,浮亏597.7万美元 金色财经报道,8月8日,据链上分析师@ai_9684xtpa监测,沉睡三年的ETH巨鲸今日苏醒,其资产较建仓时已缩水30%。 地址0x7C5…77b86曾在2022.02.15-03.21期间以均价2723.2美元提出23834.17枚ETH,价值6490万美元,随后质押进了Rocket Pool;10小时前他苏醒后向Kraken充值7323枚ETH(1396万美元),若卖出将亏损597.7万美元。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
AI倡导者已筹集1.4亿美元投入美国选举,效仿加密行业政治游说 币圈新闻: 8月8日消息,据路透社报道,支持 AI 友好政策的倡导者已筹集约 1.4 亿美元用于今年的美国选举,试图复制加密货币行业此前的政治成功模式。在上届美国大选中,数字货币倡导者投入 2 亿美元的竞选资金获得了丰厚的回报:国会迅速通过了稳定币立法,并正在考虑为该行业提供其他优惠政策。最大的亲 AI 游说组织“Leading the Future”主要资金来自 OpenAI 高管、Palantir 和 Andreessen Horowitz 等。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jinsevip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,083,683 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金色财经 VIP版” (@jinsevip), 565 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinsevip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.