Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jinoyat Psixologiyasi

Channel

Jinoyat Psixologiyasi

@jinoyat_psixologiyasi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

494subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166090915
TypeChannel
Username@jinoyat_psixologiyasi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jinoyat_psixologiyasi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

485494489.56 August 2026 — 487 subscribers6 August 2026 — 487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 485 subscribers20 August 2026 — 487 subscribers28 August 2026 — 491 subscribers6 September 2026 — 494 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 16:57494+3
28 Aug 2026, 17:52491+4
20 Aug 2026, 22:14487+2
14 Aug 2026, 14:28485-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:48487no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:47487first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4431.2%
👍4028.4%
😁1712.1%
❤139.22%
👏128.51%
🤣64.26%
💯32.13%
😱32.13%
😢21.42%
😘10.709%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC322 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

QOTILLIKNING PSIXOLOGIK MOTIVLARI: MISSIONERLIK MOTIVI Oldingi postlarimizda gedonizm va bo'ysindirish motivlarini ko'rib chiqdik. Endi navbat — missionerlik motiviga. Bu toifadagi qotil o'zini go'yoki "dunyoni tozalayotgan" odam deb his qiladi. U ma'lum bir toifa yoki qatlamga nisbatan kuchli nafrat bilan yashaydi va o'zicha "ular yer yuzida bo'lmasligi kerak" degan xulosaga keladi. Shu bilan o'z jinoyatini oqlashg…

🔥3👍2

9 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC318 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

QOTILLIKNING PSIXOLOGIK MOTIVLARI: BO'YSINDIRISH MOTIVI Bunday qotil uchun eng muhim narsa bu jinsiy zavq emas, balki hokimiyat hissi. U boshqa odam ustidan to'liq nazoratga ega bo'lishni, uning hayoti va o'limini o'z qo'lida ushlab turishni istaydi. Aynan shu nazorat unga zavq beradi. Shuning uchun ular o'ziga qurbon sifatida kuchsiz, o'zini himoya qila olmaydigan odamlarni tanlaydi. Jinoyat vaqtida esa qurbonni u…

👏3😱2

9 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

QOTILLIKNING PSIXOLOGIK MOTIVLARI: GEDONIZM MOTIVI Kriminal psixologiyada ayrim qotilliklar oddiy adovat, moddiy manfaat yoki qasos bilan emas, balki shaxsning buzilgan jinsiy-fantaziyaviy ehtiyojlari, hukmronlikka intilishi va azob berishdan zavqlanishi bilan bog‘liq bo‘lishi mumkin. Bunday holatlarda jinoyatchi qurbonni shunchaki yo‘q qilishni emas, balki jarayonning o‘zidan psixologik yoki seksual qoniqish olish…

🔥6😱1

9 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC235 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Seriyali qotil kim? Seriyali qotil — bu ma’lum vaqt oralig‘ida, ya’ni bir-biridan alohida holatlarda ikki yoki undan ortiq odamni o‘ldirgan jinoyatchi hisoblanadi. Bu yerda eng muhim belgi — tanaffusning mavjudligi. Ya’ni jinoyatlar orasida bir necha kun, oy yoki hatto yillar o‘tishi mumkin. Shu jihati bilan seriyali qotil boshqa turdagi qotillardan farq qiladi. Masalan: ➖ Seriyali qotil — birinchi jinoyatni sodir…

👍2

9 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC230 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Bugun sizlar bilan seriyali qotillarning psixologiyasi haqida gaplashamiz. ©️ @jinoyat_psixologiyasi

👏4🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈2,150 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Korrupsion xulq-atvor diagnostikasi: uch omilli model Tasavvur qiling, insonning oldida muammoni hal qilishning ikki yo'li turibdi. Birinchisi qonuniy yo'l: ariza, navbat, byurokratik bosqichlar, uzoq kutish va ko'pincha natijasiz umid. Ikkinchisi noqonuniy yo'l: tez, aniq, kafolatli. Birinchi yo'lda inson vaqtini yo'qotadi, ikkinchisida pulini. Iqtisodiy nuqtai nazardan qaraganda, moddiy imkoniyati bor odam ko'pinc…

❤2👏2🔥2

28 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC434 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Vizual Poligraf kimlar uchun? 1. Xavfsizlik va huquqni muhofaza qilish ➡️ Jinoyatlarni fosh etishda gumondorlarning emotsional reaksiyalarini va mikromimikalarini tezkor hamda aniq tahlil qilish imkonini beradi. Kontaktsiz texnologiya tufayli yashirin va xavfsiz profilaktika ishlarini olib borish mumkin. Qo'llanish sohalari: tergov, surishtiruv, chegara xizmati, bojxona, aeroport tizimlari. 2. HR va kadrlar boshq…

👍3❤2

28 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC324 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PsixodiagnostikaPhoto

Sal kam 4 oy davomida kanalga post joylamadim, sababi bir nechta ilmiy loyihalar bilan band edim. Bugun yana bir loyihamni siz bilan bo‘lishmoqchiman. Nomi — Vizual Poligraf. Bu kontaktsiz psixofiziologik tahlil tizimi. Oddiy poligraf (yolg‘on detektor)lardan asosiy farqi, bu tizim hech qanday datchik, sim yoki tanaga ulanishini talab qilmaydi. Inson shunchaki kamera oldida o‘tiradi, gaplashadi va dastur uning hola…

👍5🔥2❤1😘1

23 Mar 2026, 11:46 UTC826 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

R.Clarke tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan situatsion jinoyatchilik nazariyasiga ko‘ra, jinoyat sodir etilishi uchun uchta shart zarur: motivatsiya, imkoniyat va nazoratning yetishmasligi. Agar ushbu uch omil bir vaqtning o‘zida mavjud bo‘lsa, jinoyat ehtimoli keskin ortadi. ©️ @jinoyat_psixologiyasi

🔥7👍2❤1

11 Feb 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,210 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Korrupsiyaning eng ko‘p tarqalgan “ko’z yumish” yoki “og’zini yopish” turi mana shunday ishlaydi 😂😂😂 ©️ @jinoyat_psixologiyasi

😁9🤣4🔥2

2 Feb 2026, 11:39 UTC≈5,860 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ushbu videodagi voqea ko‘pchilikka tanish. Jabrlanuvchining bayoniga ko‘ra, bir erkak o‘z jinsiy a’zosini ataylab namoyish qilgan va voqea joyidan ketib qolgan. ➡️ Demak, ushbu jinoyatni sodir etgan shaxs harakatlari, jabrlanuvchi aytganidek pedofiliya emas. Buni fanda Eks-hibitionizm yoki Eksibitionistik buzilish (Exhibitionistic disorder. F65.2) deb nomlanadi. Pedofiliya balog‘atga yetmagan bolalarga nisbatan jin…

❤2👍2👏2😢2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jinoyat_psixologiyasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jinoyat Psixologiyasi” (@jinoyat_psixologiyasi), 494 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinoyat_psixologiyasi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.