Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘˜ π½π‘–π‘šπ‘–π‘›

Channel

π‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘˜ π½π‘–π‘šπ‘–π‘›

@jiminyl

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370164351
TypeChannel
Username@jiminyl
DescriptionΠ“Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° ΠΎ Π»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠ΅ΠΌ Π§ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ½~ΠΈ Our channels!: Namjoon - @namjoonyl Seokjin - @seokjinyl Yoongi - @yoongil Hoseok - @hoseokl Jimin - @jiminyl Taehyung - @taehyungil Jungkook - @jungkooklp Π‘Π²ΡΠ·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ со ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ➑️ @
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jiminyl

Growth

376 August 2026 β€” 37 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 37 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:4537no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:1437first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 December 2021 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ1,240
Videos
β‰ˆ61
Links
β‰ˆ2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2751.9%
❀‍πŸ”₯1732.7%
πŸ‘35.77%
πŸ’‹23.85%
πŸ₯°23.85%
πŸ”₯11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2021 to 30 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Nov 2023, 12:34 UTC707 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Ρ…ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ΡŒ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ² Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π΅?

  1. Π΄Π°76%
  2. Π½Π΅Ρ‚24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2022, 09:02 UTC790 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ£πŸ’› #photo πŸ’›πŸ£ #blackhair #selfie πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀8❀‍πŸ”₯5

16 Sept 2022, 07:27 UTCβ‰ˆ2,160 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ£πŸ’› #photo πŸ’›πŸ£ #mem πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀8❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

16 Sept 2022, 07:22 UTCβ‰ˆ1,690 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🐰πŸ₯ #photo #jimin #jk #jikook πŸ₯🐰 #mem πŸ“Ž @jiminyl πŸ–‡ @jungkooklp

πŸ‘3❀1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ”₯1

15 Sept 2022, 19:58 UTC427 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°Π΅ΠΌπŸ”₯ ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈ?πŸ€’ ΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡŒΡ‚Π΅ рСакции❀️

❀5❀‍πŸ”₯1

4 Jan 2022, 05:59 UTC647 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

πŸ£πŸ’› #video πŸ’›πŸ£ #fotosesia #blackhair πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀‍πŸ”₯5❀3πŸ’‹1

2 Jan 2022, 15:58 UTC553 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

πŸ£πŸ’› #video πŸ’›πŸ£ #fotosesia #blackhair πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀2❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ’‹1πŸ₯°1

26 Dec 2021, 10:22 UTC480 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Нравится ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎ ΡΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΊΡƒΡŽ Π±ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΡƒ Π§ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ?

  1. Π”Π°93%
  2. НСт7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ꧁πŸ₯€ΠŸΝŸΠΈΝŸΠ·ΝŸΠ΄ΝŸΠ°ΝŸΡ‚ΝŸΡ‹ΝŸΠΉΝŸ ΝŸΠΝŸΠ»ΝŸΡŒΝŸΡ„ΝŸΠ°ΝŸ ͟πŸ₯€κ§‚

24 Dec 2021, 10:04 UTC467 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ£πŸ’› #photo πŸ’›πŸ£ #blackhair #photosession πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀‍πŸ”₯1

Signed (qβ™₯β€Ώβ™₯q)𝐉𝐒𝐦𝐦𝐲 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 π›πšπ›π²(qβ™₯β€Ώβ™₯q)

24 Dec 2021, 10:04 UTC623 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ£πŸ’› #photo πŸ’›πŸ£ #white #photosession πŸ–‡ @jiminyl

❀‍πŸ”₯1

Signed (qβ™₯β€Ώβ™₯q)𝐉𝐒𝐦𝐦𝐲 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 π›πšπ›π²(qβ™₯β€Ώβ™₯q)

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @jiminyl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Nov 2023, 12:34 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Ρ…ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ΡŒ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ² Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π΅?

  1. Π΄Π°76%
  2. Π½Π΅Ρ‚24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Dec 2021, 10:22 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

Нравится ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎ ΡΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΊΡƒΡŽ Π±ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΡƒ Π§ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ?

  1. Π”Π°93%
  2. НСт7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2021 to 30 November 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 178,432 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘˜ π½π‘–π‘šπ‘–π‘›β€ (@jiminyl), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiminyl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.