😴
custom 533244867821491501927custom 51976556951801864749

Channel
@jidxupp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
591subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001548134794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jidxupp |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jidxupp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 591 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 593 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 601 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 600 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 600 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 20 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
547 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5332448678214915019 | 336 | 61.4% | |
| custom 5472073250349539246 | 61 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5197655695180186474 | 51 | 9.32% | |
| custom 5195063562157974107 | 42 | 7.68% | |
| custom 5278571706510769363 | 20 | 3.66% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 20 | 3.66% | |
| custom 5368342316908042769 | 17 | 3.11% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jidxupp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 September 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😴
custom 533244867821491501927custom 51976556951801864749
я переехала 🌟
custom 533244867821491501922custom 51976556951801864747
🖤
custom 533244867821491501927custom 519765569518018647412
🤩
custom 533244867821491501930custom 51976556951801864749
С днём рождения меня 🖤🐱
custom 533244867821491501931custom 519765569518018647411
🤍𝓘𝓷𝓯𝓸🤍 👅 𝓙𝓲𝓭𝔁𝓾𝓹 (джидыксуп) 🖤𝓛𝓲𝒇𝓮 🗝𝓣𝓲𝓴 𝓽𝓸𝓴 🤩 𝓢𝓽𝓮𝓪𝓶 🦋𝓡𝓮𝓴𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪 🤩🤩🤩 У меня только два канала основа и лайф. ПРИВАТКИ У МЕНЯ НЕТ (не видитесь на фейки🙏)
custom 53324486782149150199custom 51976556951801864743
🤩
custom 519506356215797410742custom 533244867821491501914
🤩🎀🛌
custom 533244867821491501933custom 527857170651076936320
Я словила гиперфикс на себе ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️
custom 547207325034953924661custom 533244867821491501920
🤍
custom 533244867821491501958custom 536834231690804276917
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
custom 533244867821491501965custom 528310526782999724220
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @jidxupp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 778,685 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓆩𝒿𝒾𝒹𝓍𝓊𝓅𓆪” (@jidxupp), 591 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jidxupp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.