Channel
@jichangbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628623092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jichangbg |
| Description | 本频道用于曝光垃圾机场。 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 4 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jichangbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 219 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 219 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2022 to 4 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1、在新团队接手之初，因适逢当下特殊时期，故采用转移矛盾、嫁祸于人的方式，通过在频道、群组中多次广播消息，试图降低老客户对当前机场的服务期待，在此期间的不稳定问题都归罪于敏感时期大环境所导致。 2、而实际卡顿的原因据官方自称是同机房友商被打半个多月，导致自身遭受牵连拖累，可实际上没换新团队之前的catnet稳定性一直保持正常趋势。这一点老用户都有切身体会。故有人质疑更换了廉价机房。 3、在新团队接手之后，catnet服务多日多次出现极不稳定的状态，卡顿、超时、间歇性闪断、甚至于节点全部挂b
👍1
红老嗨 @Davidabc345 (已使用 @min345666 和 @guyuan66 两个新皮囊)的云图极速机场疑似跑路。
下一位好莱坞巨星已经诞生！他是真的戏剧天才！
把circlecloud换上自己之前的alink皮囊，转让给自己小号罢了，一眼丁真。
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
circlecloud的客服就是你本人的小号之一，说销号和出让频道是忽悠你自己吗？哦，对对对，大号注销用小号暗中运作叫退出，自己出让频道给自己的小号也是出让。😂
机场曝光 pinned a photo
我们的红太阳 @Davidabc345 发表重要讲话！
❤1
#经典回顾 曝光机场：circlecloud(现已更名为alink) 恶臭频道：@alinkvpncn 恶臭域名：http://alink123.com 旧皮囊：@circlecloud123 曾用域名：http://circlecloud123.com 恶臭行为：1、机场主 @Davidabc345 （这只是他的小号之一）是毛左、大粉红，多次发表极端、煽动仇恨的言论。 2、机场线路超级垃圾，经常无人维护。 3、机场内置大量政治审计规则。 4、小牛马 @Davidabc345 居然冒称自己是新加坡人。一派胡言，我感到非常气愤！他其实是中国人，为了让其他人觉得自己的垃圾机场安全，就冒称新加坡人。 5、利用他自己的另一个频道 @easternnews123打击友商：声称其他机场是爱国机场，告诉翻墙用户不要买。其实自己开的才是最大的爱国机场。 6、多次给自己的机场换皮，跑路之后换上新皮囊再割一波韭菜。现在已经使用新皮囊ali…
❤4👍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @jichangbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“机场曝光” (@jichangbg), 219 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jichangbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.