Channel
@jianpuzhaidaqun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002438604793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @jianpuzhaidaqun @okex_support |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jianpuzhaidaqun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 131 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 131 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 129 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 130 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 131 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 131 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 129 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 129 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 128 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 128 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 128 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 128 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 17 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#跳票狗：唐茂显，纸飞机# @Ljiawen745 这狗东西谎话连篇，自己一早预谋好了跳票，还有脸来曝光。真实情况是：经朋友介绍，给他担保，公司给他订的16号的 广州-吉隆坡-金边，这个狗东西到吉隆坡了 公司给他订好飞金边的机票过后，我早上5点出发去接他他还回应，到机场后直接失联，然后假装说睡过头了。然后说要去其他公司。承认了自己跳票的。公司一开始也没说要曝光他，只是让他把机票费用给公司，毕竟去哪里是他的自由。结果这个狗东西还有脸来曝光。连一个机票钱都跳，你还出来东南亚干嘛，这点格局你来东南亚也是废物。连自己朋友都坑。还有他所说的 七号园区是黑园区也不是事实，这边园区100多家公司，有一两颗老鼠屎很正常。哪个地方不都一样。总会有那么一两个黑公司。所以不要给自己跳票找什么借口。自己跳票满嘴跑火车，一会在回国了，一会在菲律宾，一会在柬埔寨，你跳票狗嘴里都没有一句实话，还好意思来曝光，你说的话 有人信吗？现在给你全网曝光，让大家都看…
❤4
⚠️ 警告：请注意 ⚠️ Alexa Mae Yu 和 Sara Jane Lomboy 这两位女士涉嫌欺诈行为。 我公司承担了她们出国工作的全部旅行费用（包括机票、住宿、餐饮和其他个人费用），但她们抵达吉隆坡后却销声匿迹。尽管获得了全力支持和帮助，她们却选择放弃承诺，不辞而别。 我们强烈建议其他人不要雇用或与她们合作，因为她们表现出了操纵他人和不诚实的行为。 如果有人知道她们目前的下落，请私信我们。我们将悬赏 5,000 美元，以核实她们的下落。
❤2
这是一伙长期蜗居在西岗的东北诈骗团伙，以接赔的方式骗人事或者公司直招去西岗接人，期间面试回答任何问题都没问题，见面也在演戏，配合给你送上车，上车给完钱后就变脸了，几个人掏枪开始跑路，这是非常经典的骗钱接赔骗局，希望以后全柬的人事或者招人团队注意这伙东北人，去任何地方接人最好提前做好准备，在外大家都不容易，不要再被这些蛀虫欺骗。此人的护照和视频已经发到国内和大使馆，安排偷渡回去吧
❤1
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @jianpuzhaidaqun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jianpuzhaidaqun named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件/柬埔寨曝光/柬埔寨吃瓜” (@jianpuzhaidaqun), 131 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jianpuzhaidaqun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.