Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 神秘部落导航站-网络日记📓

Channel

神秘部落导航站-网络日记📓

@jiangxiaohu1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,877subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002391608982
TypeChannel
Username@jiangxiaohu1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiangxiaohu1

Growth

1,8771,9371,9077 August 2026 — 1,937 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,937 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,936 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,926 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,906 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,891 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 17 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,868–1,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 07:471,877-14
20 Aug 2026, 13:531,891-15
17 Aug 2026, 10:191,906-8
13 Aug 2026, 12:281,914-12
10 Aug 2026, 15:561,926-10
7 Aug 2026, 23:221,936-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:461,937no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:051,937first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
840.0%
😁525.0%
🕊420.0%
👍315.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC618 viewsread 7 August 2026

👍神秘部落出海🚢服务!可点击一键关注! https://t.me/addlist/f1x4SBoFYGA5MDQ9

27 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC974 viewsread 7 August 2026

🫶兄弟们一定要切记!在飞机上如果频道没有开评论区!那么一定是有问题的,切记谨慎交易! 飞机是干嘛的大家都知道,擦亮眼睛👀!交易要找靠谱的,可以多问问,不要被骗!现在这世道赚钱比吃屎都难!

10 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 7 August 2026

坐牢只会影响三代 没钱会影响世世代代 人生就像一盘棋 下错了不重要 重要的是落子无悔 勇往直前

10 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,110 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👍世界杯投注不要买私单!官方投注平台才靠谱! 🔘非本频道推荐!被骗概不负责!😫注册完找彩金专员领注册体验金😫 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🏡金运国际娱乐: jygj888.top (PG电子好打) 👍 双狮官方网址: ssgj55.cc (大水爆分中) 🫥8号国际娱乐: 8h838.vip (电子有水) 🐻‍❄️F8娱乐城: taizi111.cc ( 电子大水) 👍西港娱乐城: chen777.vip (电子好打) 认准频道推荐!出款靠谱!

1 Jun 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🅰️运势来的时候!神都让你三分!

1

17 May 2026, 11:40 UTC≈3,810 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👍行业受到冲击很正常!不用着急! 在坚持坚持✊就倒闭了

😁53

27 Apr 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 7 August 2026

👍神秘部落出海🚢服务!可点击一键关注! https://t.me/addlist/f1x4SBoFYGA5MDQ9

25 Apr 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,710 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

人的一生很短暂!要学会发现自己的闪光点,也可以理解为自己的长处 用自己擅长的和自己拥有的去建立被动收益系统!当系统完成✅就是你上岸之时

👍3

18 Apr 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,600 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#知识分享 一文读懂 USDT 三大致命风险 “冻U、黑U、假U” 作为全球市占率最高的稳定币,USDT(泰达币)已深入加密交易、跨境支付及场外 OTC 的各个角落。然而,伴随高流动性而来的是严厉的监管与层出不穷的骗局。 在圈内混,如果分不清“冻U”、“黑U”和“假U”,你的资产随时可能归零。以下是这三类风险的深度拆解。 1.冻U:链上“死资产” 指泰达公司(Tether)在智能合约层面将特定地址列入黑名单。一旦被列入,该地址内的 USDT 将永久无法转出,甚至可能被直接销毁。 发生场景: 泰达公司配合全球执法机构(如 FBI、各国警方)封禁涉嫌洗钱、恐袭、跨国犯罪的资金。 现状: 账面上能看到余额,但私钥持有者无法动用,本质上已是“废纸”。 ⚠️ 经典骗局:助记词诱饵 骗子会故意在网络上“泄露”一个含有大量 USDT 的钱包助记词。新手登录后发现余额巨大,但想转出时发现没有手续费(Gas)。当你往里充值 TRX 或

1

17 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 August 2026

冷知识:最著名的古代寓言成语故事,几乎都是讽刺型贬义词 守株待兔 杞人忧天 掩耳盗铃 杯弓蛇影 狐假虎威 指鹿为马 滥竽充数 自相矛盾 班门弄斧 画蛇添足 叶公好龙 缘木求鱼 拔苗助长 朝三暮四 按图索骥 井底之蛙 南辕北辙 夜郎自大 东施效颦 邯郸学步 买椟还珠 抱薪救火 饮鸩止渴 郑人买履 此地无银 鸡鸣狗盗 狡兔三窟 疑邻盗斧 一叶障目 囫囵吞枣 水中捞月…… 纯正能量的知名成语寓言很少:夸父逐日,精卫填海,愚公移山 而在我讲这件事之前,你会觉得“讽刺型贬义词就是负能量”吗? 同理,你之前会意识到“宫廷玉液酒,一百八一杯”也属于讽刺,并觉得是负能量吗?

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jiangxiaohu1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 913,532 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“神秘部落导航站-网络日记📓” (@jiangxiaohu1), 1,877 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiangxiaohu1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.