想你了宝宝,想和你研究“个”字结构

Channel
姜姜不吃姜
@jiangjiangjiangshan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,254subscribers
+92 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003937172641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jiangjiangjiangshan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiangjiangjiangshan |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 4,254 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 4,261 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 4,273 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 4,282 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 4,271 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 4,266 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 4,262 | +80 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 4,182 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 4,162 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 4,162 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.45%
- avg views ÷ 4,254 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 359
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.279%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,078 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 55.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
鹊桥在有情人之间相汇,我在等你
❤1
你会奉献,我会索取,我们太合适了💋12点开课~可预约了宝们
群管理:@SZcjbwBot(上榜,报告,解禁) 嫩妹学院: https://t.me/nmeix09 嫩妹学院报告:https://t.me/sznmxycjbg 嫩妹友群学生会:https://t.me/sz888w
我吃蛋糕没叉子了你可以寄把叉到我那里吗? 还有位置~明天最后一天了,要约的宝宝抓紧咯💋
❤1🔥1
高考志愿填了你,希望能上
🥰2
🌟广探优质老师,只为极乐体验🌟 🎊【真】 拒绝照骗,金石可鉴。 🎊【精】 阅尽千色,唯选至臻。 🎊【爽】 极乐之境,身心契合。 鹏城内外修车路,唯有极乐不负君。 速入极乐交流,挑选心动老师 👇 [ @jlmvip ] #极乐门·验明正身#
可以再深一点嘛🫦我是说我们的感情💋
❤1
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #地区 学生留名: #surprise 学生电报号: @suprisezz 上课时间: 7.29 老师花名: #姜姜 老师电报号: @szjiangjiang 上课花费: 2200 老师质量: 人照8.5分(跟视频更像),态度 10 分,反馈 10 分 ( PS: 按照1到10打分 ) 服务内容: 常规内容 上课过程: 前两次时间问题没约上,这次直接 pp,老师很漂亮,跟视频里的很像,态度热情,不会冷场,交流起来就像朋友,非常自然,简单闲谈洗澡后就来到床上准备步入正题,皮肤很滑,胸大概有 B,最重要的是,做爱的反馈超级真,控制不住的要自己动,感觉那一刻老师比我还爽,好评好评 优点缺点: 好看,皮肤滑,反馈真 推荐程度: 强烈推荐 ( 按照 不推…
❤3
裙子有点短,丝袜有点滑,你要来帮我检查一下吗🫦
🔥1
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #南山 学生留名: #🐟 学生电报号: @yu13856338650 上课时间: 7/24 老师花名: #姜姜 老师电报号: @szjiangjiang 上课花费: 1p 老师质量: 人照相符 9分,服务态度 10分,服务技能 9分,情绪价值 10分 ,环境卫生 9分,有无陪洗:有 ( PS: 按照1到10打分 ) 服务内容: xcz 丝袜制服 蛇吻 上课过程: 赶在台风来临的前一晚约到妹妹,如约而至,妹妹穿着裙子迎接我,妆容打扮很精致,颜值耐看,进来聊了几句交课费洗澡,由于卫生间小就简单冲洗一下到床上慢慢调情,妹妹穿上丝袜制服亲咪咪,接着蛇吻,往下吹箫,很舒服,带套开干,反馈很好,配合度高,后入很顶,屁股圆润有肉,女上体力天花板,最后顺利出水,体验非常…
好想你站在阳台,一边让我看着窗外的车水马龙,一边让我感受背后你深深的爱意💋
🔥3❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jiangjiangjiangshan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SHFriendsBG · 4153 posts优质师生群(中转站)
@SZHKFriendsyzq · 18,8213 posts深圳出击俱乐部
@RomanticBabyyou · 12,3472 posts深圳长安群中转导航站🚪(传送门)
@Changan8976 · 5,2231 postLotteryBest抽奖导航
@lotterynav · 173,5081 post深圳·嫩妹学院🅢
@nmeix09 · 35,4801 post深圳出击俱乐部认证榜
@RomanceofWindbaby · 14,3851 post深圳东莞公开榜
@ShenZhen_68 · 21,7251 post深圳东莞老师开课广告群
@Shenzokba · 11,7101 post(深圳)学生会🥇
@sz888w · 45,7341 post深圳·嫩妹学院【出击报告】
@sznmxycjbg · 4,7391 post南山 瑶瑶车中转站
@szyaobaobao · 2,6781 post深圳东莞集团报告(仅供参考)
@yeshanghai96 · 5,8071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“姜姜不吃姜” (@jiangjiangjiangshan), 4,254 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiangjiangjiangshan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.