Channel
@yeshanghai96
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,676subscribers
+202 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002328407963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yeshanghai96 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yeshanghai96 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 4,676 | +85 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 4,591 | +108 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 4,483 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 4,474 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,568 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：桃子 【老师的ID】：@TaoziF88 【学生留名】：叶无痕 【验证时间】：2026.8.19 【所在位置】：岗头 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：🐻很大，手感很好，温柔不催钟 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：本人跟照片差别不大，🐻非常大，进门先递了水，洗澡的时候忍不住上手了，🐻和屁股手感都非常好，柔软滑嫩。 洗完澡转战二楼，先感受老师的口技，非常娴熟，完全没有齿感，口了一会就很有感觉，马上戴套开干，先是女上，看着老师在身上起起伏伏，非常有感觉，然后是传教士体位出水，结束后可以一起洗澡。
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【妹子花名】：小草，。@Ciiooio 【验证留名】：哥的传说 【验证时间】：8月11日 【所在位置】：宝安 【颜值评分】：人照8分，嫩妹20岁 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：身材没有一丝赘肉，皮肤紧致，小腹平坦，少女有活力健康的身材。很清爽。实战环节很投入，水多，会眯着眼享受做爱，很配合，后入会下腰耸动屁股迎合抽插节奏，不催时间会反食。 【优点缺点】：温柔，态度好，配合度高 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：人照一致，邻家清纯妹妹类型，有张子枫的既视感。无纹身皮肤白，化妆技术很自然，脸上带一抹红晕给人娇羞的感觉，想好好呵护她。
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【妹子花名】：宝安霓霓 @ninibaby08 【验证留名】：酒欧 【验证时间】：2026.8.10 【所在位置】：宝安 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：第一眼就很抓人的类型：短发可爱风，笑容很甜，整个人干净清爽。身材偏瘦但比例很好，腿很长，线条也顺，看着很舒服。性格温柔，爱笑，互动感不错，不会让人有距离感。 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：这次是下午临时起意约的，看到群里照片感觉不错，就直接冲了。打车一个小时到达课室，位置很好找，是那种比较高档的公寓，环境加分不少。 进门第一眼和照片基本一致，甚至更灵动一点。简单沟通后交水费，然后去洗澡，节奏很自然。 因为自己新兵蛋子来的，再加上本身比较敏感，这次直接选了包时。整体两个小时下来，一共四次。前两次因为她状态太紧，123😭兄弟们也别笑话俺；后面慢慢适应后，状态稳定…
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：乐宝宝 【老师的ID】： @leibaobao6 【学生留名】：瓦子 【验证时间】：8.10 【所在位置】：宝安 【颜值评分】：8.5 耐看 【身材评分】：8.5 大长腿 【服务评分】：8 嫩妹里算好 【优点缺点】：紧致，很嫩很润，越做越润。大长腿，大屁股。有些纹身，话少，情绪价值一般 【推荐程度】：8.5 【个人发挥】：超新嫩妹，人照8分，耐看，170，A+杯，不胖不瘦，皮肤滑嫩，好嫩的手感。浅聊一会，提出洗澡。乐宝宝脱衣服害羞到，要跑到房间里脱，让我更想调戏她了。 洗净躺床，先跟乐宝宝大🐍特🐍，交缠互动挺好。舔咪咪口牛牛，口技在嫩妹里算很不错，且口很长时间，好评。轮到我翻身品尝妹妹，观赏一番，毛毛又软又浅又稀疏，颇有白虎既视感。用了十成舔功，也没能把乐宝宝舔出叫声，作罢。 戴套女上，乐宝宝真的紧致。女上功夫一般，那我就主动起…
❤1
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：小萍子 【老师的ID】：@ping8888877 【学生留名】：匿名 【学生的ID】： 【验证时间】：2026.8.9 【所在位置】：沙井 【颜值评分】：7.5 【身材评分】：8.5 【服务评分】：8 【优点缺点】： 优点：嫩妹下面粉，身体敏感，课室干净。 缺点：不能🐍，也没成功舔到下面 【推荐程度】：8分，确实比较嫩，穴粉，而且相对主动 【个人发挥】： 约课后赶紧出发，因为去错地方导致迟到了15分钟左右，老师表示后面有急事pp改成了p，老师态度很好我也表示理解接受。 正常洗舔吹开局，发现老师很敏感，亲了亲奶子下面已经润了，戴套就开干，老师的叫声还是十分动听的，不过感觉老师可能确实比较着急，做的时候没那么投入，虽然本来是抱着慢玩的想法来的，传教士转后入，直接加速出水快速拔枪结束战斗。
👏1
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：恋恋 【老师的ID】：@lianlian168 【学生留名】：小丑开始 【验证时间】：8.9 【所在位置】：福田 【颜值评分】：9.5（真人比频道年轻） 【身材评分】：10 【服务评分】：8.5 【优点缺点】：真实嫩妹，童颜巨乳无赘手，皮肤光滑白皙真🐻c+青筋清晰可见。缺点嫩妹通病比较随性 【推荐程度】：喜欢嫩妹和大奶的操盘手非常推荐，吃服务躺尸老哥慎重 【个人发挥】：中奖出击，约好时间地方好找。进门看到老师人照一致，比照片年轻很多，巴掌脸白皮，可可爱爱。坐下就迫不及待验货老师的巨乳，老师很配合，跨坐在身上一个劲摸我。玩了一会去洗澡，洗完上床。大蟒蛇起手，自然让老师躺下开始操盘，老师很敏感，亲亲奶子摸摸豆豆就已经湿透了，一个劲的喊舒服，房间隔音不太好自己还很自觉的把音乐开起来。随着老师身体一阵抖动应该是高潮来了，看着下面一伸一缩想呼…
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：梓菡 【老师的ID】： @zixin221 【学生留名】： 赳鸠 【所在位置】：南山 【颜值评分】：人照一致 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9.5 【优点缺点】：嫩妹 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：夜色温柔，星光点点，都不及眉眼间的笑意动人 进门环境挺好的，老师笑脸☺️相迎，一手拿着水一手牵着我的手一起去沙发坐，交流期间眼神交流频繁，很有女友般的感觉，手在妹妹的大腿四处摩挲，手感很好不是竹竿子类型（肉肉的确又不显胖），交流过程中老师好像忘记水费的事了（果然是新人妹妹），提醒完交费，脱衣洗漱忍不住摸上了妹妹的奶子，小粉点嘿嘿，牵着我的小臂靠在我身上带我去的，洗完帮忙擦干，老师提醒洗漱台上面有漱口水（其实进去的时候我就看到了嘿嘿） 回到卧室（私密性挺高）躺在床上妹妹直接跨在你身上吻了上来（那种感觉很柔很柔）不是大蟒蛇那种突兀冲击感更像…
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【妹子花名】：乐宝宝 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：8.9 【所在位置】：宝安 【颜值评分】：8.5 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：8嫩妹三件套 【优点缺点】：优：高170，高瘦三点粉，下面毛适中无异味，大长腿，人照一致……手臂有点纹身，偶尔抽烟但是舌吻无异味！ 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：进门就看到一双大长腿，妹妹还有点害羞，坐沙发上我就开始把玩妹妹的大长腿了……妹妹也不催，我玩了一会奈子和腿之后就交了水费，妹妹就说脱衣服去洗洗…太热了一身汗！洗完以后我躺床上，妹妹就开始跟我舌吻甜甜的……然后一边抚摸妹妹下面痘痘一边舔老师的奈子…一会下面就湿了，下面穴口比较小！ 然后妹妹就一直舔我，非常认真，我不说停，妹妹就一直舔……我提出69，妹妹吃招我的弟弟舔着我的蛋蛋，我在次扒开妹妹的小穴摸着豆豆，妹妹说好痒……提出能不能戴套了，我说可以……先…
堕落: 深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：小晚 【老师的ID】：@xiaowan520a 【学生留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：8.9 【所在位置】：南山 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：无缺点 【推荐程度】：非常推荐 【个人发挥】：进门就被老师红色长裙给惊艳。老师和频道照片没有任何差别。非常漂亮。老师比较佛系，不是那种催钟的。进门之后不会催促洗澡啥的，而是聊天给矿泉水，依偎身边。 洗澡真的很贴心，完全不需要自己动手，全部负责。精致小脸蛋越看约动心。 洗完澡上床就是开始蛇，和舔胸等。还玩了跳跳糖。老师属于m，很敏感，先是上位，然后后入，边干边听水声。老师又娇羞，又娇喘的。让人欲罢不能。 随后采用传教士交出答卷。 结束之后，也是认真帮忙洗澡，聊天。不催着你出门，继续闲谈依偎着。很不错的一次体验。 老师是新人，但是非常健谈体贴。美貌真的是…
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：林雪 【老师的ID】：@linxueii 【学生留名】：木马 【验证时间】：8.8 【所在位置】：深圳南山 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9.5 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：都是优点没发现缺点 【推荐程度】：强烈推荐 【个人发挥】：一直想约林雪老师，因为有好几个群友安利说不错，周末迫不及待的约上。课室位置不错，按指引上楼，进门林雪老师给了个热情拥抱，仔细看看老师颜值不算特漂亮但是蛮耐看，172的模特身高，气质出众。 妹妹很热情，交了水费接着脱下衣服去洗洗。发现妹妹身材特别好，胸部饱满圆圆的，身材前凸后翘，S形难得的极品身材。 看着小弟弟就起来了，特别是沐浴露在老师的挺胸上下滑动，就像果冻般丝滑。 洗完来到房间抱着温柔的舌吻，接着开始细致服务，给我口了蛮久，感受得到妹妹性格态度非常好。到我简单操盘，亲吻她身体乳头的时候，敏感年轻…
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【妹子花名】：豆豆 【验证留名】：没名字 【验证时间】：8.6 【所在位置】：宝安 【颜值评分】：漂亮 【身材评分】：窈窕淑女君子好逑 【服务评分】：尽心尽力不敷衍 【优点缺点】：没有 【推荐程度】：五星推荐 【个人发挥】：期待已久的豆豆今天决定出击了订的两P，抱着探雷的心态去找豆豆老板娘的，因为价格低，应该不怎么好看！结果见真人后，完全不一样，非常漂亮的御姐，皮肤超白，脸瓜子长的精致，不胖不瘦风韵犹存，😍是我喜欢的类型，没让我失望！ 服务耐心，六九和🐍吻特别奈斯，态度很好，不催时，我第一次写报告，因为词穷，不会写！ 大胆出击，这个价格上是我遇见最好最值得的老师，还会反食物！
深圳集团报告： https://t.me/+T_cG2VyxBB8xYzU1 【老师花名】：乔伊伊 【老师的ID】：@Qiao118801 【学生留名】：杜老二 【验证时间】：8.5 【所在位置】：福田 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9.5 【优点缺点】： 烧，服务好，顶级享受 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：遥控上门，老师位置挺好找的，见面人照9分，化妆比较浓，脸蛋红红的很妩媚。闲聊几句脱衣一起洗澡，皮肤很白屁股很大，洗了一半浴室灯自动关了，在暗光下老师给我来了水中萧。擦干身体选上丝袜开始正戏，老师一下子进入角色那叫一个烧，双方互相调情，眼神带着交流，然后老师开始给我舔，从上往下，边舔边看着我像是要吃调我一样，技术非常好。接着我换我来给老师舔，边舔老师边烧叫着，还喊着不要停，看的出老师很想高潮，可惜我手活不够熟练，于是我抱着老师时而舌吻时而亲奶子，老师自己手动，一会下来一直高潮了，一抖一抖的。好家伙还…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @yeshanghai96. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 83,437 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳东莞集团报告（仅供参考）” (@yeshanghai96), 4,676 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yeshanghai96.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.