📱交流群: @jianquanzi ↖️ 群组抽奖内容: - 飞机会员3个月*5 - 海澜之家精品内裤一套*2 - 100元和成天下精品槟榔大果*4 邀请和签到都可获得积分参与抽奖,20积分参与一次 🕒 开奖时间:满20人自动开奖
😭5❤3✍1

Channel
@jian_zhaopin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-2,073 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002276833403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jian_zhaopin |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jian_zhaopin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 1 | -2,089 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 2,090 | +13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 2,077 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 2,082 | +18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 2,064 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 2,080 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,076 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 2,069 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 2,071 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 2,068 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 2,076 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 2,074 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 2,074 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
247 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 93 | 37.7% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 20.6% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 9.31% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 4.45% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 2.43% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 2.02% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.405% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jian_zhaopin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 March 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📱交流群: @jianquanzi ↖️ 群组抽奖内容: - 飞机会员3个月*5 - 海澜之家精品内裤一套*2 - 100元和成天下精品槟榔大果*4 邀请和签到都可获得积分参与抽奖,20积分参与一次 🕒 开奖时间:满20人自动开奖
😭5❤3✍1
今年春节前预估开设4个梯队 目前第1梯队已满 准备打粉 其他梯队仅接受预约入职 具体开放时间在预约后会私信通知 📱 @liucong
👀8
目前全球态势都不乐观,靠谱的赚钱公司更是少之又少,曾经被坑的狗推也是有仇报仇,有怨报怨,聪哥建立频道至今仍旧无负面,公信力不言而喻,因此不做任何无效解释。 任何跟随公司的员工,均视如己出,不管是何时何地,都保障安全,不黑不坑,不体罚不打人,不买不卖,模式成熟,资源优质,能赚到钱能拿到钱。即使是停工状态也保证管吃管住。 模式主打股转股,员工待遇基本都是1000u左右的底薪,6~15的点位提成,更详细的看现场总监制定公布。做哪个国家,在哪办公听安排即可,不必多问,唯一要求是做满2波。 护照是压的,提成是压一半的,时间是规定做2波的,在职期间禁止赌毒的,并且需要遵循公司调度的,不接受就算。 任何未清账跑路的,不讲良心的,在后续将统一打包处理: 无证件照片清一色监控调取人脸 社工库查档;将证件群发至国盘尾刀客户,并配以话术 “此证件照片是负责诈骗你的业务员,他现在已经从我们公司跑路了,你被骗的钱也在他身上,有问题联系公安处理吧”…
❤9👍6🤣6👀3
预计7月底开始上人,想入职或代理需提前预约。 地点:老挝 非特区,只要有护照的。 模式:马来西亚股转股 要求:做满2波 注:配套、管理成熟 资源优质 安全第一,赚钱第一,拿到钱第一,只负责这三件事。 股票盘老手优先,有能力的其他盘老手请咨询聪哥。 📱 @liucong
💩4❤3
聪哥本人 私人号不对外,目前只有2个招聘号 📱@liucong 礼物编号#88881 📱@liucongzhaopin 其他均为冒充,本人非HR人事或中介劳务! 出现任何资金争议或人员问题,本人均不负责! ⚠️ 群友反馈的假冒如下:⚠️ ❌假冒频道: 骗子发现了 已隐藏 ❌ ❌假冒号: 骗子发现了 已隐藏 ❌ ❌假冒群: 骗子发现了 已隐藏 ❌
💩5❤3
韩股已满,停止上人。
💩11
招聘模式:韩国 股转股 地点:老挝 招聘预计截止时间:6月底 要求:做满2波。 股票老手优先,有护照优先,有路费优先(可报销) 今日起开始报名,先到先得,招完为止。 📱 @liucong (扔💩的不发财)
👍17💩14❤9💯5
Channel name was changed to «东南亚招聘»
洪森的这次发话,代表了柬埔寨的实权圈,也映射出了其他国家的态度。 总结一句:园区是彻底退出了明面。 柬埔寨这个唯一有主权、统一的国家,园区真神,也确确实实的倒下了,墙倒众人推,其他国家也纷纷跟风抄家敛财,预估持续个1-2年左右才会结束这个“全球打击诈骗高压态势” 被解救的猪仔,失业的推推,迷茫的代理,没关系,聪哥依旧还在,在这个大揭底的时期,聪哥依旧没有负面,公信力不言而喻。同时也正式将群名和频道名从柬埔寨招聘改为东南亚招聘🥳 聪哥飞机📱 @liucong
💩9👍7❤2
老挝见
💯14💩5
说句肺腑之言,感谢大家对聪哥一直以来的信任和关注,不更新就意味着大家请苟住,猥琐发育别浪,局势很不乐观。不坑害国人是我们的底线,普通人翻身江湖道义是我的准则,承蒙厚爱。 我一直在!
👍16💩16❤4
目前对外招聘 优先有股票盘经验,有护照 优先。 暂时办公场地还在选址待定,请时刻关注频道,或直接找聪哥预约。 无护照有股票经验的老手也可联系 但不一定录用,有护照的其他盘老手也可尝试联系,一切看聊天的感觉和态度。 📱 @liucong ↖️
💩12❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @jian_zhaopin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“jian_zhaopin” (@jian_zhaopin), 1 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jian_zhaopin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.