Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ptasie mleczko

Channel

ptasie mleczko

@jestem_katerina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,265subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211171195
TypeChannel
Username@jestem_katerina
Created12 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jestem_katerina

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2572,2752,2666 August 2026 — 2,274 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,273 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,267 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,268 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,262 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,257 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,258 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,259 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,261 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,265 subscribers2,2656 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,254–2,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:192,265+4
13 Sept 2026, 00:592,261+2
9 Sept 2026, 06:152,259+1
3 Sept 2026, 19:362,258-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:442,260+3
26 Aug 2026, 03:062,257-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:342,258-4
19 Aug 2026, 17:332,262-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:332,268+1
12 Aug 2026, 22:142,267-6
10 Aug 2026, 03:412,273-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:052,275+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:312,274first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

574 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534173798380654843827147.2%
custom 527421946153088474720034.8%
custom 526525729930321292910317.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC489 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 526525729930321292918custom 53417379838065484385custom 52742194615308847474

6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC460 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще, я прекрасно понимаю, что здѣсь написано и ваши язвительныя комментаріи ни къ чему. Потеря своей старой личности и обрѣтеніе новой это событіе, не могущее не вызывать слёзъ. Другое дѣло, что подобный переходъ не проходятъ большинство современныхъ людей (для нихъ просто не существуетъ принципіальной разницы между ролью дѣвушки и жены). Поэтому и печали у многихъ нѣтъ. (Это не призывъ къ разсужденію о томъ, по

custom 526525729930321292914custom 53417379838065484388custom 52742194615308847474

6 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC473 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ставь лайкъ, если хочешь, чтобы прелестная рыжая бестія завела тебя въ глубины лѣсной чащи

custom 534173798380654843829custom 52652572993032129291custom 52742194615308847471

6 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC469 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 527421946153088474720custom 534173798380654843812custom 52652572993032129291

6 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC527 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лично я радуюсь и трепещу какъ собачка 💍💍

custom 527421946153088474745custom 534173798380654843815custom 52652572993032129294

6 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC482 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @popadiyavarvara

какое-то повальное свадьбирование почему женский пол радуется и трепещет как собачки, виляя хвостом, перед кольцом? да зачем вы палитесь так, хоть оно тысячу раз «заветное»! потеряли достоинство личности как единицы нормальная женщина просто горько плачет в этот момент потому что вмиг осознание потери своей «философской жизни», своего одиночества, своей ментальной юности в любой высокой народной культуре брак о

custom 526525729930321292914custom 527421946153088474710custom 53417379838065484384

6 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC541 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 534173798380654843829custom 527421946153088474710custom 52652572993032129295

4 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC583 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 527421946153088474715custom 52652572993032129291

4 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC670 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 534173798380654843825custom 52742194615308847476custom 52652572993032129292

1 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC881 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔮Церковнославянская sвѣзда преле‌стнаѧ обозначает планету. Тогда сама "планета" откуда? Конечно изъ греческаго πλανήτης, или ἀστὴρ πλάνης, что въ буквальномъ переводѣ — блуждающая звѣзда. 🧵 ἀστέρες πλανήται называются "блуждающими звѣздами" потому что въ отличіе отъ прочихъ звѣздъ онѣ мѣняютъ своё положенію, блуждаютъ по небосводу. Римляне называли ихъ erraticae stellae, греки — οἱ πλανώμενοι ἀστέρες или πλανήται..

custom 526525729930321292914custom 53417379838065484389custom 52742194615308847475

1 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC747 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Станиславъ Выспяньскій нарисовалъ картину подъ названіемъ "Jutrzenka" — такъ поляки называли Венеру.

custom 534173798380654843821custom 52652572993032129293custom 52742194615308847472

1 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC772 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какъ славяне называли космосъ😇 🌌Помню, въ дѣтствѣ я очень разстроилась, узнавъ, что Земля не самая большая планета солнечной системы (почему-то мнѣ казалось, что лучше и больше Земли быть ничего не можетъ и не должно). 🕊Чуть позже я также разстроилась, узнавъ, что одни язычники занимались астрономіей и называли планеты въ честь Боговъ (Юпитеръ, Марсъ, Венера), въ то время какъ другіе (славяне) ничего подобнаго не

custom 534173798380654843837custom 527421946153088474712custom 52652572993032129295

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @jestem_katerina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ptasie mleczko” (@jestem_katerina), 2,265 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jestem_katerina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.