Intinya, anak cantikku @.jeoncgian bersih yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa y___y

Channel
response to @spilljeoncgian ✿
@jeoncgianbersih
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003802177182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jeoncgianbersih |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jeoncgianbersih |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 2 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 47s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, saya mengimbau kepada seluruh pihak untuk tidak lagi menanggapi isi dari channel tersebut. Atas perhatian dan kerja samanya, saya ucapkan terima kasih banyak.
Karena itu, channel klarifikasi ini dibuat untuk menegaskan bahwa pemilik username dan username @.jeoncgian sendiri tidak memiliki keterkaitan dengan konflik yang dibahas dalam channel @spilljeoncgian, serta untuk mencegah kesalahpahaman yang dapat merugikan pihak yang tidak terlibat dalam permasalahan tersebut. Berdasarkan bukti dan kronologi yang tersedia, permasalahan yang dibahas dalam channel @spilljeoncgian be…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Intinya, anak cantikku @.jeoncgian bersih yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa y___y
response to @spilljeoncgian ✿ pinned «Klarifikasi Mengenai @spilljeoncgian Channel ini dibuat untuk mengklarifikasi bahwa pemilik username @.jeoncgian saat ini tidak memiliki hubungan dengan konflik yang dibahas dalam channel @spilljeoncgian. Channel tersebut membahas pengalaman pribadi pemilik…»
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, saya mengimbau kepada seluruh pihak untuk tidak lagi menanggapi isi dari channel tersebut. Atas perhatian dan kerja samanya, saya ucapkan terima kasih banyak.
Karena itu, channel klarifikasi ini dibuat untuk menegaskan bahwa pemilik username dan username @.jeoncgian sendiri tidak memiliki keterkaitan dengan konflik yang dibahas dalam channel @spilljeoncgian, serta untuk mencegah kesalahpahaman yang dapat merugikan pihak yang tidak terlibat dalam permasalahan tersebut. Berdasarkan bukti dan kronologi yang tersedia, permasalahan yang dibahas dalam channel @spilljeoncgian be…
Proof #4. Komunikasi dengan Pemilik Channel @spilljeoncgian Dalam percakapan berikut, saya telah menjelaskan kepada Caelum atau Euphie (@.kyyatto or now @kkawai) bahwa username @.jeoncgian saat ini dimiliki oleh pihak yang berbeda dan telah meminta agar username tersebut tidak lagi dikaitkan dengan channel @spilljeoncgian. Meskipun telah dijelaskan bahwa keberadaan channel tersebut berdampak pada aktivitas dan reput…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Proof #3. Upaya Klarifikasi dan Permintaan Maaf dari Pihak Seller Sebelumnya Setelah permasalahan terjadi, pihak seller sebelumnya menghubungi pemilik channel @spilljeoncgian (Caelum atau Euphie @.kyyatto or now @kkawai) secara langsung untuk mengakui kesalahan, menjelaskan kronologi dari sudut pandangnya, serta menyampaikan permintaan maaf beberapa kali. Dalam percakapan tersebut, seller sebelumnya juga meminta aga…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @jeoncgianbersih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“response to @spilljeoncgian ✿” (@jeoncgianbersih), 1 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeoncgianbersih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.