Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

% 詹👾 »›J3NNIFER 𝗉𝗋𝗼𝖽 ! 𝅄

@jenniferprod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002285993147
TypeChannel
Username@jenniferprod
Description𖥻 * 詹妮 JENNIFER [ дженнифер ] 𔓕 '' ׅ 💜 studio ± portfolio / @airinstudi " @portairin ! 𔘓 me – @jyuwkox ( she/her ִ ) 𝆭˓ׄ. ּׄ۫ : ㅤㅤㅤㅤ набор – cl0sed ㅤ @prodpaily_bot — предложка
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 26 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jenniferprod

Growth

4212 Aug 2026, 21:18 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:31 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:1812 Aug 2026, 21:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:3142no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:1842first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

229 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53256122756906570553515.3%
👀2912.7%
custom 53282058904765930992611.4%
😈2410.5%
custom 5276439856543708776219.17%
👾208.73%
custom 5377402627728351854198.30%
custom 5377520614774939920156.55%
custom 5379566853158870649156.55%
🆒114.80%
🐳73.06%
custom 528530447147416275152.18%
10.437%
🕊10.437%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2025 to 26 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2025, 21:12 UTC≈1,590 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

максимальное количество реакций на посты выше ! 🤩

custom 53256122756906570554custom 53282058904765930994

7 Mar 2025, 21:10 UTC≈1,490 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩 ! оценка новой эре ↓

😈7custom 53256122756906570557👾6👀4custom 53282058904765930993

7 Mar 2025, 21:02 UTC≈1,420 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53256122756906570557👀6😈6custom 53282058904765930995👾2

7 Mar 2025, 21:00 UTC≈1,950 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ - 🤩 ˓ׄ.𝖠𝖡𝖮𝖴𝖳 JENNIFER𖥻 -com.prod › ( – Jenn ִ ) ˖𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽 ׁ ׄ◌ ׂ 🤩erf3ct ֶ֪ ֩ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ . 𖧧 💋 JENNIFER PROD. – лучш𝗎й п𝗉𝗈дюс𝖾𝗉 к𝗈т𝗈𝗉ый 𝗈б𝖾𝖼п𝖾чит т𝖾б𝖾 п𝗈п𝗒ля𝗉н𝗈𝖼ть ! 🤍 💠𝖼т𝖺тья 𝖼𝗈 в𝖼𝖾й 𝗎нф𝗈. & 👾← ִ𝆬ׄ᷼ 𝅄 🤩〔 #jenn 𖥻best #sexy💜 ֹ 〕 ׁ 𔘓 🤩 ◌ 🤩THER : ۪ ֩ ➿. ׁ ֶ֪ ֩💜 — @jenniferprod𝅄 ( 𑂯tgc'' ) ➿*⸼🔐 — ≥ @ailyprod_bot ( 𖧧b𝗈t𝇌 ) ダ BOO$T ← 𖥻please 𝇌 🤩 𔘓 Me is example 𝑜𝑓 ideal ± 日本 𓈒 𝆭 ꯭ ‌𝆹𝅥 http

custom 532561227569065705512custom 532820589047659309911😈9👾8👀5

7 Mar 2025, 19:59 UTC≈1,030 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩New💠🤩ra. .? ≥ « reacti0n . . maybe . . today ? 𖥔

custom 53256122756906570555👾4🆒3custom 53282058904765930993👀2😈21

30 Jan 2025, 15:41 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩 лучшие каверы января . . ↓ @юзергруппы + ссылка ≥ — $end in comments 🌊 ֪⠀۟ 𔓕᳢‌ ׅ ᜔ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ! без спама ! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ✅@ailyprod and . . soon ? ! )

🐳2custom 53795668531588706492custom 52764398565437087761custom 53775206147749399201

30 Jan 2025, 15:20 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52764398565437087762custom 53774026277283518541custom 53795668531588706491

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jenniferprod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 948,503 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“% 詹👾 »›J3NNIFER 𝗉𝗋𝗼𝖽 ! 𝅄” (@jenniferprod), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenniferprod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.