16 May 2026, 15:29 UTC≈2,290 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Kembali lagi ke sini ya, tiap orang bisa punya cara main yang berbeda.
❤6
Channel
Jenis Jenis Tipe RP
@jenistiperp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
558subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001887076205 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jenistiperp |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jenistiperp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 558 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 557 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 557 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 31 | 70.5% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 29.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
16 May 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 10 August 2026
Tips menentukan lebih baik OC atau AU. Jika kamu ingin karakter A as B, maka cobalah AU. Jika ingin berfokus pada alur dan ingin membuat "orang baru," maka cobalah OC. OC > Penulis adalah tuhan. Penulis lebih leluasa. Kamu boleh bikin dia yang tadinya kalem jadi pemarah total. AU > Penulis masih punya "tanggung jawab" menjaga esensi dan nama baik karakter (terutama untuk karakter 3D seperti aktor/idol/public figure…
16 May 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 10 August 2026
Contoh pertanyaan yang lebih pas: OC "For oc purpose. Visual male dari korea/anime/manhwa/dll untuk orang yang banyak tingkah, punya humor rendah, sedikit narsis, tapi tetap perhatian kira-kira cocok siapa ya?" "Orang yang pendiam, tapi pekerja keras lebih cocok pakai visual karakter A atau B ya? Oc purpose!" "Pengen nyoba bikin oc. Visualnya si A dari anime sport. Kalau dibuat penyuka seni aneh ngga ya?" "Oc genre …
16 May 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,700 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Jadi untuk menjawab pertanyaan ini. Seharusnya kalimat yang di bold itu termasuk ke AU bukan OC. Masih banyak kulihat orang-orang salah kaprah dengan "OC = Karakter as ...." padahal bukan seperti itu. Kalau seperti itu lebih menjurus ke AU. Mungkin banyak yang kebingungan karena kebanyakan orang meminta pendapat visual karakter yang sifatnya begini begitu untuk keperluan oc dengan kalimat yang kurang pas.
16 May 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,520 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Lalu apa yang menjadi pembedanya? OC -> dia tidak ada hubungan sama sekali dengan karakter asli/benar-benar terlepas dari karakter yang digunakan. Gaada keterkaitan apapun. Semisal menggunakan karakter Gojo Satoru sebagai wajah, lalu mengganti namanya menjadi Joko. Kemudian dibuatlah latar belakang Joko ini sebagai anak kuliah. Maka Joko ini sudah berdiri sendiri sebagai "Joko," bukan lagi sebagai Gojo. Gojo hanyala…
16 May 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,320 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Seperti yang sudah dijelaskan... OC (original character) itu karakter orisinil. Jadi isinya pure imajinasi penulis. Penulis bebas untuk menulis ulang atau merombak semuanya, mulai dari nama, latar belakang, tempat, dan lain-lain. Di OC, penulis juga masih diperkenankan untuk mengadaptasi beberapa sifat atau kondisi asli dari karakter yang digunakan (semisal mengambil dari tokoh/karakter yang sudah ada. Tidak termasu…
❤2
16 May 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 10 August 2026
Kalian masih bingung nggak sih membedakan antara OC dan AU? Atau mungkin sering dengar/baca pertanyaan seperti ini di base: "for OC purpose kalian mau lihat karakter X as apa?" Sebenarnya kalimat seperti itu termasuk ke OC atau AU sih?
16 May 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 10 August 2026
Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
30 Apr 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,530 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Kalian masih bingung nggak sih membedakan antara OC dan AU? Mau kubahas? 🤔
👍8
29 Apr 2026, 03:14 UTC≈1,590 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Dari hasil wawancara diatas, bisa disimpulkan bahwa RP adalah bermain peran yang tujuan awalnya menghidupkan karakter melalui tulisan atau imagine menggunakan imajinasi. Karena esensi roleplay itu sendiri ada di bermain peran/imagine/plotting. Bukan boleh atau tidak menggunakan karakter ini dan itu, entah itu manusia asli, karakter fiksi, atau bahkan hasil dari kustomisasi. Selama kita tetap menjunjung etika (sepert…
👍5
29 Apr 2026, 03:13 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 10 August 2026
Aku telah meminta pendapat ke beberapa narasumber mengenai isu ini. Berikut jawaban mereka setelah kurangkum dan kuperjelas: Nara 1 roleplayer aktif Boleh-boleh saja asalkan bukan hasil AI. Platform seperti Zepeto atau Gacha tidak masalah karena kita membangun karakter sendiri di sana. Namun, ada pengecualian untuk platform seperti MC Lads karena dianggap kurang fleksibel untuk kustomisasi wajah (meskipun hal ini ma…
29 Apr 2026, 03:13 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 10 August 2026
❓: Boleh ngga sih muse itu pakai karakter buatan sendiri? Ini pertanyaan yang seringkali bikin orang bingung. Seperti yang kita tahu, roleplay itu luas. Dan yang dimaksud luas disini, benar-benar luas. Bahkan aku sendiri pernah melihat roleplay di lapak ebook. Jika kita melihat secara objektif, sebenarnya hal ini sah-sah saja. Karena pada dasarnya RP itu Role Play atau bermain peran. Jadi seharusnya tidak menjadi m…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jenistiperp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 521,644 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jenis Jenis Tipe RP” (@jenistiperp), 558 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenistiperp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.