Channel
@jedaal_tv
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,157subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001298833080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jedaal_tv |
| Created | 15 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jedaal_tv |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jedaal_tv/187 · this entry24 May 2021, 01:11 UTC | @jedaal/84324 May 2021, 08:54 UTC | 1.00 | 7.7 hours |
| @jedaal_tv/188 · this entry25 May 2021, 15:53 UTC | @jedaal/84725 May 2021, 15:55 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @jedaal_tv/190 · this entry26 May 2021, 07:53 UTC | @jedaal/84926 May 2021, 18:51 UTC | 1.00 | 11 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @jedaal | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 50 minutes | this entry (6–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 May 2021 to 19 April 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @jedaal_tv — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 3,157 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 3,159 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 3,160 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,160 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
جدال روز: آیا سلطنت دلار رو به پایان است؟ سه شنبه سی فروردین ده شب یوتیوب جدال از قیمت گوجه فرنگی تا پوشک بچه در ایران متاثر از تحریم اقتصادی است. تحریمی که بیش از چند دهه است که اقتصاد ایران را تحت تاثیر خود قرار داده. اما چند ماه گذشته اتفاقی جدید هم افتاده و حملات اقتصادی آمریکا ابعادی وسیعتر گرفته و حالا گریبان روسیه با اقتصادی چند برابر اقتصاد ایران را هم گرفته. برغم مرکزی بودن بحث تحریم در ایران و تاثیر روزا…
گپ نوروزانه خودمانی جدال: از ابی تا آلبرایت پنجشنبه ۴ فروردین ۱۱ شب یوتیوب جدال https://youtu.be/7luPAO3dfl4
ساعت ده امشب به وقت تهران برنامه زندهای درباره اتفاقات اخیر افغانستان در یوتیوب جدال خواهم داشت. در این برنامه با محسن اسلامزاده، سازنده مستند «تنها میان طالبان» صحبت میکنم. اگر شما هم سوالاتی درباره طالبان دارید در بخش کامنتها بنویسید تا در این برنامه مطرح کنم. http://youtube.com/jedaal_tv
🎙فایل صوتی تحلیل #انتخابات_۱۴۰۰ پس از رد صلاحیتها 🔻با حضور وحید اشتری، سیدحسین شهرستانی (منتقدان شورای نگهبان) و علی جعفری و مرتضی خمسه (مدافعان شورای نگهبان)
✔️برنامه شب گذشته #جدال_روز منتشر شد. 💠 تحلیل #انتخابات_۱۴۰۰ پس از رد صلاحیتها 🔻با وحید اشتری و سیدحسین شهرستانی (منتقدان شورای نگهبان) و علی جعفری و مرتضی خمسه (مدافعان شورای نگهبان) درباره رد صلاحیتها صحیت کردیم که میتوانید در یوتیوب یا آپارات ببینید یا در پلتفرمهای پادکست به آن گوش کنید. https://aparat.com/v/JTukX https://youtu.be/ovDBAOGeEIw https://tinyurl.com/56xsm738
🎥شورای نگهبان به مر قانون عمل کند یا مصلحتاندیشی کند؟ آیا میتوان به مشارکت بیتفاوت بود؟ آیا منتقدین امروز، منتقدین تائید صلاحیت روحانی هستند؟ چرا شوآف دانستن پیگیریهای رئیسی برای تائید صلاحیت دیگران، دفاع بدی از اوست؟ و سوالهای دیگری که دکتر سیدحسین شهرستانی در گفتوگو با علی علیزاده به آن پاسخ داد. 🔻فایل با کیفیت را در صفحه اینستاگرام روزنامه فرهیختگان ببینید. @FarhikhteganOnline2
تلویزیون اینترنتی جدال pinned a photo
✅ #جدال_روز 💠 تحلیل #انتخابات_۱۴۰۰ پس از رد صلاحیتها با حضور: 🔻دکتر پرویز امینی، 🔺دکتر مرتضی خمسه، 🔻سیدحسین شهرستانی، 🔺وحید اشتری، 🔻علی جعفری. در حال تلاش برای دعوت از نمایندگان اصلاحطلب هم هستیم. 🕒امشب سه شنبه ساعت ۲۱:۳۰ از طریق لایو اینستاگرام به آدرس: https://instagram.com/ali.alizadeh.aliz @jedaal_tv
🎙اولین گفتکوی جدال درباره مسائل روز. گفتگوی علی علیزاده و سرباز روحالله رضوی درباره جنگ اخیر اسراییل و فلسطین. طرفین هر کدام در این جنگ چه از دست دادند؟ آیا آتش بس پایدار خواهد بود؟ آیا مقاومت با ورود به عرصه نظامی به دستاوردهای سیاسی تظاهرات فلسطینیها ضربه نزد؟ چرا واکنشها در ایران نسبت به این جنگ حتی نسبت به کشورهای غربی کمتر بود؟ این جنگ چه تاثیری روی وضعیت لبنان و عراق و سوریه وایران میگذارد؟ پادکستهای رادی…
این سالها اینستاگرام هرگونه صحبت درباره منطقه و مقاومت را سانسور و مجازات کرده. دو راه بیشتر پیش رو نبود. یا از گفتگو درباره مقاومت دست برداریم یا خود دست به کار شویم و برای تصمیم نابخردانه سیاست گذارانی که ۴۵ میلیون ایرانی را به خطرناک ترین شبکه اجتماعی یعنی اینستا کوچ دادند چاره ای بیندیشیم. برغم همه دشواریهای فنی تصمیم گرفتم که لایوها و برنامههای مرتبط با منطقه را به یوتیوب منتقل کنم. ساعت ده امشب اولین «گفتگو…
🎥 #کلیپ_تصویری ✅ تناقض لاریجانی 🔺بخشی از گفتگو با پرویز امینی، تحلیل آرایش انتخابات پس از ثبت نامها @jedaal_tv
🎥#کلیپ_تصویری ✅ آیا احمدی نژاد از جمهوری اسلامی عبور کرده است؟! 🔺در سالهای گذشته احمدی نژاد متهم شده است که نقشی سازنده در سیاست ایران بازی نکرده است و به جای تعامل با ساختارهای نظام تنش را با حاکمیت افزایش داده است. حتی برخی او را متهم کرده اند که او تبدیل به یک اپوزوسیون در جمهوری اسلامی تبدیل شده است. 🔻از احمدی نژاد پرسیدم چرا او نیز مانند محمد خاتمی که بنیاد باران را تشکیل داد و تکرار کرد در انتخابات تاثیر مس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jedaal_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,037,876 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jedaal_tv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تلویزیون اینترنتی جدال” (@jedaal_tv), 3,157 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jedaal_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.